Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Which would show better  (Read 2550 times)

wmchauncey

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 793
Which would show better
« on: January 01, 2014, 08:06:59 am »

I have several of these BIF images that have been photo-merged.
Would the merged image show better than would a grouping of the individual images.




.
Logged
The things you do for yourself die with

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: Which would show better
« Reply #1 on: January 01, 2014, 10:02:34 am »

I think they're both work.

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Which would show better
« Reply #2 on: January 01, 2014, 12:24:19 pm »

The single is a superior image, in my mind. No matter how it became one, it just is: beautiful.

In the early 50s, in Scotland, there was a home decoration phase described as the wally duck (stamper will correct the local spelling if I blew it) where porcelain ducks of varying dimensions would be arranged on a single wall in a sitting room. That's what the second, multiple duck image reminded me of immediately...

And by the way, happy new year, stamper.

Rob C
« Last Edit: January 01, 2014, 12:30:15 pm by Rob C »
Logged

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16046
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Which would show better
« Reply #3 on: January 01, 2014, 01:58:23 pm »

I agree with Rob. Even with the pushed color saturation it's beautiful.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

wmchauncey

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 793
Re: Which would show better
« Reply #4 on: January 01, 2014, 05:12:04 pm »

It sounds like my goal would be to PP both methods and go from there...thanks for the accolades guys!       ;)
Logged
The things you do for yourself die with
Pages: [1]   Go Up