Pages: 1 ... 109 110 [111] 112 113 ... 137   Go Down

Author Topic: Without Prejudice 2  (Read 722209 times)

BobDavid

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3313
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2200 on: December 04, 2016, 12:10:01 am »

Man on the go plus a photographer's shadow:
« Last Edit: December 04, 2016, 12:17:59 am by BobDavid »
Logged

Bruce Cox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1077
    • flickr
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2201 on: December 04, 2016, 12:16:31 pm »

Take Off
« Last Edit: December 05, 2016, 12:48:53 pm by Bruce Cox »
Logged

drmike

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 988
    • On Flickr:
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2202 on: December 04, 2016, 12:54:00 pm »

@bob in a similar vein



mike
Logged

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5566
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2203 on: December 04, 2016, 02:57:35 pm »

.

BobDavid

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3313
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2204 on: December 04, 2016, 04:07:05 pm »

@bob in a similar vein

mike

Ha! that's funny. The hill in my photo is the tallest peak in Sarasota. It's a landfill. Was your photo taken in the Southwest?
Logged

Harald L

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 857
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2205 on: December 04, 2016, 05:02:23 pm »

Winning is the art of stand up again.

Logged
Glad to be an amateur

drmike

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 988
    • On Flickr:
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2206 on: December 04, 2016, 05:09:01 pm »

Ha! that's funny. The hill in my photo is the tallest peak in Sarasota. It's a landfill. Was your photo taken in the Southwest?

India, near some Park which is meant to be full to bursting with Tigers. Yeah right. Nice day out though and I got to drive a Mahindra Jeep copy for a while. The telescope was used to locate wildlife within the park and that's why they are all pointing. They have seen a bison or something. I'm not a great lad for nature on the whole :) I think my wife looks very Imperial :)
Logged

muntanela

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 687
    • BRATA
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2207 on: December 05, 2016, 04:14:41 am »

Winning is the art of stand up again.


I'll send it to italian (former) "young" prime minister Renzi... (But I really hope he will never stand up again... ;D)

Galata morente (Der sterbende Gallier)
« Last Edit: December 05, 2016, 08:07:47 am by muntanela »
Logged

brianrybolt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 625
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2208 on: December 05, 2016, 07:27:14 am »

Somewhat religious image.

Ercolano, Naples, Italy (Near Herculaneum)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 25171
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2209 on: December 05, 2016, 09:01:07 am »

Somewhat religious image.

Ercolano, Naples, Italy (Near Herculaneum)

Damned nice graphic image.

Rob C

graeme

  • Guest
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2210 on: December 05, 2016, 07:32:09 pm »

Damned nice graphic image.

Rob C

Absolutely
Logged

graeme

  • Guest
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2211 on: December 08, 2016, 08:18:03 pm »

Groyne Lighthouse, South Shields, Uk: My favourite building.
Logged

graeme

  • Guest
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2212 on: December 08, 2016, 08:22:56 pm »

The Parish Church, Kirkby Stephen. An interesting church. Wish I'd got the cross in focus - never mind.
Logged

graeme

  • Guest
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2213 on: December 08, 2016, 08:24:05 pm »

More from Windermere, UK.
Logged

graeme

  • Guest
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2214 on: December 09, 2016, 05:48:45 pm »

Todmorden Town Hall, UK.
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 25171
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2215 on: December 10, 2016, 08:57:47 am »

Black and white, as undigital as I can get it to look when it's finished! Creature of habit, I guess.



Rob

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22813
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2216 on: December 10, 2016, 09:07:13 am »

Black and white, as undigital as I can get it to look when it's finished! Creature of habit, I guess.



Rob
Smooth. Must be Panatomic-X. Sure ain't Tri-X.   ;)
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 25171
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2217 on: December 10, 2016, 09:41:11 am »

Smooth. Must be Panatomic-X. Sure ain't Tri-X.   ;)

Would you buy Nikon's FP4, processed in CCD, of course?

Rob

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22813
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2218 on: December 10, 2016, 01:45:54 pm »

Would you buy Nikon's FP4, processed in CCD, of course?

Rob
I never cozied up to Nikon, except for enlarging lenses. Maybe you mean Ilford FP4? That was nice stuff. I can't even remember what I processed it in. Maybe Kodak XTOL? I tried Rodinal early on, and D-76, of course, but in later years it was something from the big yellow box.

But that was all before I went over to the Dark Side.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 25171
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2219 on: December 10, 2016, 03:35:17 pm »

I never cozied up to Nikon, except for enlarging lenses. Maybe you mean Ilford FP4? That was nice stuff. I can't even remember what I processed it in. Maybe Kodak XTOL? I tried Rodinal early on, and D-76, of course, but in later years it was something from the big yellow box.

But that was all before I went over to the Dark Side.


I shall never cross-process a joke again. Promise. Not on LuLa, anyway! It's clealy too progressive.

Film, as in cassettes and rolls. I didn't like TXP in 135; I always used it in 120, exclusively, except when I had to do 120 colour, and then it was Ektachrome. On 135 I shot only FP3/4 and HP3/4; both, as well as the rolls of TXP 120, went through D76 1+1.  Never used anything else when I stopped being an amateur. As an amateur I tried everything, all the time, and of course, didn't learn how anything worked. In the end, I realised that knowing one chemistry set well let you do anything you wanted to do. For colour, Kodachrome, when there was time to spare between shoot and holding the picture in my hand, otherwise, Ektachrome. I only used Velvia when I was doing non-people pics, which wasn't very often. Never had the opportunity to try Kodachrome on 120. Almost never used colour neg after I went solo. Almost nobody needed it, thank God.

I only used Schneider Componon enlarger lenses.

Rob
« Last Edit: December 11, 2016, 04:34:29 am by Rob C »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 109 110 [111] 112 113 ... 137   Go Up