Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: haven  (Read 2955 times)

Jeremy Roussak

  • On Probation
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
haven
« on: January 02, 2013, 02:45:12 pm »

Comments?

Jeremy
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17915
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: haven
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2013, 03:02:28 pm »

Unusual composition, but I like it. I have a sense there was more sky before cropping, and, once again, I wish I could see more of it, even if blown out.

wolfnowl

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5824
    • M&M's Musings
Re: haven
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2013, 01:21:03 am »

Unusual composition, but I like it. I have a sense there was more sky before cropping, and, once again, I wish I could see more of it, even if blown out.

I agree.  The lighting is great, but I'd like to see more of the source.

Mike.
Logged
If your mind is attuned t

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12642
Re: haven
« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2013, 10:47:09 am »

I agree.  The lighting is great, but I'd like to see more of the source.

Mike.

I can only agree!
Logged
Francois

Jeremy Roussak

  • On Probation
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: haven
« Reply #4 on: January 04, 2013, 04:05:19 pm »

Unusual composition, but I like it. I have a sense there was more sky before cropping, and, once again, I wish I could see more of it, even if blown out.

Your whim is my command! Here it is: I didn't like it much, and I thought the cropped shot was sufficiently unusual for me to get away with it.

Jeremy
Logged

Bruce Cox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1077
    • flickr
Re: haven
« Reply #5 on: January 04, 2013, 04:52:29 pm »

I layered a B&W conversion over it.

Bruce
Logged

Jeremy Roussak

  • On Probation
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: haven
« Reply #6 on: January 04, 2013, 07:01:42 pm »

I layered a B&W conversion over it.

You've certainly improved the sky, Bruce, but the rest of the shot has now lost everything that appealed to me in the first place. I'll try some "clever" masking tomorrow.

Jeremy
Logged

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15859
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: haven
« Reply #7 on: January 04, 2013, 07:27:59 pm »

Jeremy, how about just always posting your original uncropped version with the cropped version so that right off the bat everybody can see the how cropping damages a good image. Almost always -- perhaps always -- when you've posted an altered version and then been talked into posting the original, it turns out the original is the better of the two. It's obvious you have "the eye." Why not stick with what your eye gives you?
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

Jeremy Roussak

  • On Probation
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: haven
« Reply #8 on: January 05, 2013, 10:01:22 am »

Jeremy, how about just always posting your original uncropped version with the cropped version so that right off the bat everybody can see the how cropping damages a good image. Almost always -- perhaps always -- when you've posted an altered version and then been talked into posting the original, it turns out the original is the better of the two. It's obvious you have "the eye." Why not stick with what your eye gives you?

I'll give it some thought! In the meantime, how about this version? I've added a negative exposure mask in LR, overlying the sky. I think the thing in the distance is a lighthouse, so it'll even tick one of Bill's boxes!

Here, also, is another from the same walk.

Jeremy
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22442
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: haven
« Reply #9 on: January 05, 2013, 10:32:15 am »

The new version is just fine, IMHO. Don't change another thing.
The rainbow is nice, too.

Eric
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15859
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: haven
« Reply #10 on: January 05, 2013, 11:45:07 am »

I'm with Eric, Jeremy. Very nice. I like the rainbow, but what makes that picture for me is the ominous clouds encroaching on the hills.
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

seamus finn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1243
Re: haven
« Reply #11 on: January 05, 2013, 12:59:36 pm »

Quote
The new version is just fine, IMHO. Don't change another thing.
The rainbow is nice, too.

Eric

+1
Logged

sdwilsonsct

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3282
Re: haven
« Reply #12 on: January 05, 2013, 01:17:05 pm »

Both fine shots. But the rainbow has a great interplay of lines, light and shapes that I find very engaging.

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12642
Re: haven
« Reply #13 on: January 07, 2013, 04:31:51 am »

Yes, the new version is the best. I like the "rainbow" image a lot. All the diagonal lines produce a very nice effect along with the heavy sky.
Logged
Francois

RobbieV

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 281
    • My work.
Re: haven
« Reply #14 on: January 07, 2013, 10:31:43 am »

Wow to the new uncropped negative exposure overlayed image! The extra space helps the picture take a deeper breath, with the light being exhaled onto the landscape. Very nice.
Logged

mseawell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 733
    • Mark Seawell's Photo World
Re: haven
« Reply #15 on: December 16, 2018, 06:23:56 pm »

Interesting! I do love the "God rays" but for the the rainbow image takes the cake!

Mark
Logged

petermfiore

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2668
    • Peter Fiore Fine Art
Re: haven
« Reply #16 on: December 18, 2018, 12:43:11 pm »

Jeremy, how about just always posting your original uncropped version with the cropped version so that right off the bat everybody can see the how cropping damages a good image. Almost always -- perhaps always -- when you've posted an altered version and then been talked into posting the original, it turns out the original is the better of the two. It's obvious you have "the eye." Why not stick with what your eye gives you?

Russ that's not always true. If one is a good designer, they always a shot with a specific image in mind for a more powerful image.

Peter
« Last Edit: December 18, 2018, 03:04:14 pm by petermfiore »
Logged

Jeremy Roussak

  • On Probation
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: haven
« Reply #17 on: December 18, 2018, 02:57:18 pm »

I've just fiddled with the rainbow shot a little more. Better?

Jeremy
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22442
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: haven
« Reply #18 on: December 18, 2018, 07:14:29 pm »

I've just fiddled with the rainbow shot a little more. Better?

Jeremy
Yes. And you haven't overcooked it, either.

Eric
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)
Pages: [1]   Go Up