Hi everyone,
I would like to wrap up my experience with b&w printing and Epson printers: 4000, 9880 and 9890. Do you have the same or similar experiences?
- Epson 4000: To print b&w with the color driver is bad. QuadToneRip on matte paper works not bad. White and glossy papers are bad. What I really like is to print in the black mode on (very) matte natural paper with linearization using "Chang's" method. Print resolution is reduced but this gives the prints have a nice texture and a warm brownish tint – no method for high resolution but very pleasing for the eye.
- Epson 9880: No method so far led to satisfying results (custom color profiles, QTR, ABW with linearization). Everything looks greenish with a bit of cyan and the measurements reflect this.
- Epson 9890: ABW with linearization on white papers works fine (Ilford Gold Fibre Silk for example). On natural fine art papers (Hahnemühle Photo Rag for example, not the bright white version) the prints look strange.
If you compare the prints directly the differences are very visible. If you compare them to a nice print on Agfa Brovira you want to throw the Epson Printer out of the window... But then, going back into the darkroom is not an option for me (at least at the moment).
So here are my questions:
–> Is the 9880 really so bad for b&w printing compared to the 9890 or do I have an individual problem?
–> What can I do to improve the b&w quality of the 9890? I find the prints just nice, not stunning.
–> Do you see also metamerism too?
–> Is ImagePrint 8/9 a real improvement?
I know a lot of people like their b&w prints with the Epsons. Perhaps I'm to critical and expect too much.
Thank you,
Best,
Johannes