Just watched the latest Culture on BBC2 where there was a segment on David Bailey and his current show about a vanishing part of London he knew as a kid. During the conversation he mentioned his interest in 'street' and the interviewer asked him why he was doing this since he was well-known for being anti-art photography. He replied that he wasn't anti the genre just the name. Reasonably, he said that nobody speaks in terms of art painter, art sculptor, so why art photographer?
Oh, he was carrying a black M of some sort... I didn't notice any screen on the back, perhaps too rapid a cut for me, but could he still be on film? Maybe so - why not?
I think I've worn better, a least what's visible. But then, I would think that.
Rob C