If you think technical perfection is the factor that determines the quality of a street shot then you obviously don't understand street photography. And, after yawning my way through your "observed" shots I see that that's your problem. You seem to be a fairly competent wedding photographer, and that's fine, but it's not the same thing.
Sadly, you seem to be turning into Amolitor, substituting personal attacks for debating. The poor technical quality is not why I did not like your shot, if it was pin sharp and 36mp, it would still be a family snapshot in my view. I simply don't like that particular shot, no big deal. I don't expect everyone to like all my pics or even any of them.
I posted some of my observed shots earlier and your response was
I like all three of your street shots
and suddenly you're getting all nasty about the same work.
Now if you had actually bothered to look at my 'observed shots' rather than take cheap shots, you would have seen than technical perfection is not really what those shots are about. As explained above, I want to be able to choose when to do lo-fi and when to do high quality. Some of them are made to look lower quality than straight out of camera, some are not. But I have the choice, it is not forced upon me.
I often say that limitations can make for great creativity, but at other times they can be simply limiting if you want to do something quite specific.