Topic: Love those Trees (Read 886534 times)

Jeremy Roussak · « **Reply #1760 on:** January 28, 2016, 04:58:22 am »

Quote from: MattBurt on January 27, 2016, 01:06:59 am

ancient trees

I like this very much, Matt. The colour gradations in the sky add a lot: it wouldn't work in monochrome, unlike many tree shots.

Jeremy

Krug · « **Reply #1761 on:** January 28, 2016, 11:48:59 am »

Hedgerow stalwart

MattBurt · « **Reply #1762 on:** January 28, 2016, 11:58:40 am »

Quote from: kikashi on January 28, 2016, 04:58:22 am

I like this very much, Matt. The colour gradations in the sky add a lot: it wouldn't work in monochrome, unlike many tree shots.

Jeremy

Thanks and yes, the color in the sky is what prompted the photo. I was late for the sunset light as I often am in the winter, trying to get up the trail to a nice vista, huffing and puffing, and wanted a shot of the Belt of Venus looking so vivid since I knew I wouldn't make it to my originally intended spot in time. This tree (that I have photographed before) was the first reasonable foreground interest I could get to before the color faded.
Being late for sunset helps keep me in shape!

Krug · « **Reply #1763 on:** January 29, 2016, 03:42:01 pm »

Military Trees - Double File and Echelon .... sorry slightly different processing .... comments please.

Bruce Cox · « **Reply #1764 on:** February 01, 2016, 06:59:40 pm »

pistachio?

BobDavid · « **Reply #1765 on:** February 01, 2016, 09:57:06 pm »

Quote from: Krug on January 13, 2016, 12:45:23 pm

One of the compensations of winter is the silhouetting and simplification of scenes - or maybe I'm clutching at straws ?

Two more winter tree scenes - one framing a turgid semi-frozen creek and the other of one of the dead bark-stripped standing trunks that are not uncommon in this area.

I post to get your comments and criticisms and advice, etc., so I hope that these are sufficiently interesting to produce such response.

Very nice, especially the first one...

degrub · « **Reply #1766 on:** February 01, 2016, 10:45:27 pm »

Quote from: Bruce Cox on February 01, 2016, 06:59:40 pm

pistachio?

San Antonio ?

Bruce Cox · « **Reply #1767 on:** February 02, 2016, 10:28:57 am »

Quote from: degrub on February 01, 2016, 10:45:27 pm

San Antonio ?

Outlet mall, San Marcos

where I found this crape myrtle as well

degrub · « **Reply #1768 on:** February 03, 2016, 12:56:23 am »

Could be. i can't see the last remaining leaves clearly, but they look more like a Hawthorn to me.
http://texastreeid.tamu.edu/content/TreeDetails/?id=33

BobDavid · « **Reply #1769 on:** February 03, 2016, 02:26:19 am »

Quote from: Bruce Cox on February 02, 2016, 10:28:57 am

Outlet mall, San Marcos

where I found this crape myrtle as well

clever scene, great tonality, too much noise reduction?

Bruce Cox · « **Reply #1770 on:** February 03, 2016, 01:19:14 pm »

Quote from: BobDavid on February 03, 2016, 02:26:19 am

clever scene, great tonality, too much noise reduction?

Fault may lie elsewhere in its stars than noise reduction, which I did not consciously use. This was from a Sigma DPM3 at, I think, f8, 320/sec, and ISO 100.

I made two quite different raw conversions in black & white with Sigma's raw converter and then blended them to suit in Photoshop with no sharpening or further cleverness.

Such like is my current fad in processing and worked better here than flogging the color version to death at great length in Photoshop.

kencameron · « **Reply #1771 on:** February 15, 2016, 04:49:38 am »

Walking down from Whitney Portal to I think it was Tuttle Creek Campground. They strike me now as a little bit ugly, but that is what it looked like at the time.

Chairman Bill · « **Reply #1772 on:** February 15, 2016, 09:41:18 am »

Quote from: Krug on January 29, 2016, 03:42:01 pm

Military Trees - Double File and Echelon .... sorry slightly different processing .... comments please.

They're both nicely composed. I like to think I might have taken something similar had I come across the scene. I think I might have processed differently, but that's about subjective preference. I see little wrong in either one.

Dale Villeponteaux · « **Reply #1773 on:** February 15, 2016, 01:27:04 pm »

Dancing trees from a park in Prague.

Regards,
Dale

stevenfr · « **Reply #1774 on:** February 15, 2016, 01:58:52 pm »

A couple of panoramic images. I hope you find them interesting.

Steven

http://www.friedmanphoto.com

Chairman Bill · « **Reply #1775 on:** February 15, 2016, 06:09:22 pm »

A local shot

BobDavid · « **Reply #1776 on:** February 16, 2016, 10:40:52 pm »

Well done. I think it's framed up really well, especially the way the cloud hides behind the big tree. I've looked at this picture a few times; it has a lot going on while being quiet at the same time. Irony.

Eric Myrvaagnes · « **Reply #1777 on:** February 16, 2016, 11:43:48 pm »

Quote from: Chairman Bill on February 15, 2016, 06:09:22 pm

A local shot

I'm beginning to suspect you carry one tree around in your car and plunk it down in various suitable locations for photographing.

This one suggests a nursery school teacher (the tree) taking the little tots (the Beech hedge). out for an outing, making them all hold hands so nobody gets lost

You've got quite a collection of nice tree shots now. Time for an exhibit?

petermfiore · « **Reply #1778 on:** February 17, 2016, 08:04:19 am »

Quote from: Eric Myrvaagnes on February 16, 2016, 11:43:48 pm

I'm beginning to suspect you carry one tree around in your car and plunk it down in various suitable locations for photographing.

That's what us painters do all the time...

Peter

Chairman Bill · « **Reply #1779 on:** February 17, 2016, 03:48:03 pm »

Thanks for the positive comments, folks. As for trees - living in the Somerset countryside means I'm never stuck for a tree to include in a photograph

Author Topic: Love those Trees (Read 886534 times)