Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 ... 147   Go Down

Author Topic: Love those Trees  (Read 796817 times)

EduPerez

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 700
    • Edu Pérez
Re: Love those Trees
« Reply #620 on: May 29, 2012, 09:03:25 am »

I'll agree with the rest: number one is very nice... and proves again that the photographer is more important than the tool.
Logged

wolfnowl

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5824
    • M&M's Musings
Re: Love those Trees
« Reply #621 on: May 31, 2012, 01:33:46 am »

Thanks, folks!  I like to think the photographer and the camera work together.   ;D

Mike.
Logged
If your mind is attuned t

muntanela

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 687
    • BRATA
Re: Love those Trees
« Reply #622 on: May 31, 2012, 10:13:13 am »

I love birches and larches and (fanatically...) the Valtelline valley.


Logged

wolfnowl

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5824
    • M&M's Musings
Re: Love those Trees
« Reply #623 on: June 01, 2012, 02:00:52 am »

Thanks for sharing your work.  Perhaps ironically, I'd prefer the first one w/o the bright yellow tree taking up half the foreground, and only a quiet greenspace of firs with the occasional dab of yellow from the birch in the background and the light.  YMMV!

Mike.
Logged
If your mind is attuned t

muntanela

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 687
    • BRATA
Re: Love those Trees
« Reply #624 on: June 01, 2012, 05:03:09 pm »

Thanks for your analysis. I have the same feelings as yours about this image of some years ago... What does it mean  "w/o" and "YMMV!" ?

Excuse my poor, barbaric English...
Logged

Chairman Bill

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3335
    • flickr page
Re: Love those Trees
« Reply #625 on: June 01, 2012, 05:25:22 pm »

w/o = without
YMMV = Your mileage may vary (in other words, you might not agree)

wolfnowl

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5824
    • M&M's Musings
Re: Love those Trees
« Reply #626 on: June 01, 2012, 10:00:54 pm »

Thanks, Bill.  I forgot that not all members have netspeak as a first (second, third...) language.

Mike.
Logged
If your mind is attuned t

muntanela

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 687
    • BRATA
Re: Love those Trees
« Reply #627 on: June 02, 2012, 04:39:04 am »

w/o = without
YMMV = Your mileage may vary (in other words, you might not agree)

Ah! Then I don't agree, let's put the thing so: we agree at 50%... :D
Logged

Jeremy Roussak

  • On Probation
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: Love those Trees
« Reply #628 on: June 02, 2012, 11:04:05 am »

I love birches and larches and (fanatically...) the Valtelline valley.
They're all good. I see Mike's point about the first. My favourite is the second, though.

Jeremy
Logged

sierraman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 418
Re: Love those Trees
« Reply #629 on: June 02, 2012, 09:36:52 pm »

Yosemite Valley Ponderosa Pines
Logged

tom b

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1471
    • http://tombrown.id.au
Re: Love those Trees
« Reply #630 on: July 11, 2012, 04:58:25 am »

Trees from the Eyre Peninsular.







Cheers,
Logged
Tom Brown

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17818
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Love those Trees
« Reply #631 on: July 11, 2012, 02:52:39 pm »

You might find this of interest:

10 Most Famous Trees in the World

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Love those Trees
« Reply #632 on: July 12, 2012, 03:53:04 am »

In a class of their own, Tom.

Rob C

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Love those Trees
« Reply #633 on: July 12, 2012, 03:56:18 am »

You might find this of interest:

10 Most Famous Trees in the World




And to think that they forgot the Tree of Hope, the most important tree that there is after the chemical saviour genre.

Rob C

Mjollnir

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 547
Re: Love those Trees
« Reply #634 on: July 12, 2012, 12:57:02 pm »

You might find this of interest:

10 Most Famous Trees in the World

lulz.  I grew up with #6 which, while beautiful, is more famous for being a corporate logo than anything else.
Logged

tom b

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1471
    • http://tombrown.id.au
Re: Love those Trees
« Reply #635 on: July 12, 2012, 01:21:10 pm »

I would have thought the Bodhi Tree, Bodhgaya would have been on the list.

Cheers,

Logged
Tom Brown

wolfnowl

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5824
    • M&M's Musings
Re: Love those Trees
« Reply #636 on: July 12, 2012, 03:06:27 pm »

Thanks for the link!

Here's a shot from Marcia and one from me.  Both bigleaf maples, both processed with an 'orton effect'.

Mike.
Logged
If your mind is attuned t

Mjollnir

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 547
Re: Love those Trees
« Reply #637 on: July 13, 2012, 10:37:05 am »

Just not sure if I like the processing on this one or not; it's a B&W convo, and one of about 30 I took of this beautiful sandbar in the Merced River just 200m west of Swinging Bridge.  It's too 'something'.


Frozen Beach, Merced River by tanngrisnir3, on Flickr
Logged

jule

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 738
    • http://www.juliestephenson.net
Re: Love those Trees
« Reply #638 on: July 13, 2012, 08:00:39 pm »

These were my very first tree portraits... :-)

http://juliestephenson.net/trying-something-new-my-first-tree-portrait/

Julie
Logged

wolfnowl

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5824
    • M&M's Musings
Re: Love those Trees
« Reply #639 on: July 14, 2012, 02:59:17 am »

Love the first one, Julie!!

Mike.
Logged
If your mind is attuned t
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 ... 147   Go Up