I jumped into digital MF this past summer when I picked up a demo P30 back and started using it on my 500c/m. I'm more than pleased with the quality of the output in the studio, especially compared with 120 film or my D3/D700 gear. I would love to be able to use my P30 on location and handheld, but, argh, combined with the 500c/m it's just not an effective solution.
I started looking at the Mamiya 645 AFD cameras, and the Phase One 645. Money is definitely a factor - so I doubt I'll be buying anything new. That leaves me looking at a used Mamiya + lenses. I know that I'll need to get the mount switched from the V to Mamiya mount, which isn't cheap.
Some questions:
1. Any thoughts on the Mamiya AF lenses vs. my mid-80's Hasselblad CF T*'s? Will I be disappointed, or are they comparable?
2. Is the Mamiya AF reasonable accurate in daylight? This is going to be handheld, so, don't care about hunting AF in the dark.
3. Is the 645AFD III that much better than the 645AFD II?
4. Does the P30 need a cable when attached to the Mamiya?
Thanks!
Couple quick answers Andrew.
Generally, optical resolution should be equivalent, although there is no comparison with regard to build quality. The Mamiya AF lenses are not built with the same durability in my experience. Now, as to individual lenses, keepers, dogs, the rendering, etc,, I'm sure many can weigh in.
In good light, the AF on the AFD II is accurate, but it is not fast and can hunt even when not in the dark. The III improves on the II, but not dramatically, compared to the DF. In any case, it obviously will come up very short compared to your D700, but may suffice as long as you understand the limitations.
No cable is required, the contact is electronic.
Format change is $2,500 if it is not a Value Added Warranty.
Steve Hendrix
