Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: True Recovery  (Read 7236 times)

Peter_DL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 544
True Recovery
« on: June 10, 2009, 04:35:48 am »

Logged

Roger Calixto

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 141
True Recovery
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2009, 06:06:14 am »

Interesting. Thanks for the link.
Logged
--------------
If my day job wasn't so cool, I'd quit and be a photographer =)

Lightbox

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 136
    • http://www.shaunquinlan.com
True Recovery
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2009, 05:39:38 pm »

I've been using a very similar technique for a while now, something I kind of just "figured" out for myself through a lot of experimentation in photoshop. I was using Photomatix a lot to merge 7-9 shot sequences of mostly landscapes, but more often than not was unhappy with the results, especially alignment even though a tripod is always used.

A scene shot in ideal light, early morning or late afternoon, often only needs 2 exposures, 2-3 stops apart. I then take both images into ACR and process each for their respective detail areas, then open both images as tiffs in Photoshop. Go to your "Shadow" image and run through each channel, looking for the one with the most detail in the darkest parts of the image, make a selection based on the chosen channel and then create a new layer off your background using this selection. Duplicate this new layer into your "Highlights" image, turn the visibility of this new layer off,  then create a "Shadow Darks" luminosity mask from Tony Kyuper, check out the new "Shadow Darks" channel and maybe up the contrast using a levels adjustment, then I use "Surface Blur" on this channel, most often at 10/30 for my image size, 4368x2912.

Now you can click on the channel to make it active as a selection and apply this selection as a mask to your new layer with the shadow detail, analyze the results, and adjust opacity. I also find that you get much more accurate color in shadow areas from an image exposed just for the shadows, so I also make a duplicate of the "Shadow" image in full and import this into the working image, move it to the top of your layer stack and set the blending mode to "Color". Now use the same or a new luminosity mask for this color layer so you have accurate color in the shadows.

I find this a much better way to extend dynamic range within an image, sure its a lot more work, but you get to know the details of the image as you build it up and you have a lot of options for tweaking each layer as you go.

.
« Last Edit: June 10, 2009, 10:37:41 pm by Lightbox »
Logged

Tyler Mallory

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 62
    • http://www.tylermallory.com
True Recovery
« Reply #3 on: August 06, 2009, 01:58:11 pm »

Cool trick. Really does work well. I'd add that working in 16-bit helps a little bit with the shadow noise when doing those final lightening adjustments at the end.

Pete Ferling

  • Guest
True Recovery
« Reply #4 on: August 07, 2009, 10:01:51 am »

Michael has a older tutorial that covers something similar, it was before RAW, and required taking two separate exposures of the scene, (limited to tripod or very careful matching):

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorial...-blending.shtml

With RAW and LR I quit shooting multiple exposures (with exception of extreme differences), and I would adjust two separate copies exposing one for highlights and another for shadows,  and export to PS.  However, True recovery is good adaption of a single RAW file and smart object features and will save time.  Which is a good thing.  The older I get the more I value it....
Logged

Pete Ferling

  • Guest
True Recovery
« Reply #5 on: August 07, 2009, 10:51:58 am »

Did a little experiment.  He is a three pan stitch result from a 40d with LR adjustments only:

[attachment=15866:Ferling0..._LR_Edit.jpg]

Now here is the same shot with True Recovery method:

[attachment=15867:Ferling0...rue_Edit.jpg]

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up