Hi,
You may check the following pages by Lloyd Chambers:
http://www.diglloyd.com/prem/index.htmlhttp://www.diglloyd.com/diglloyd/infos/Zei...nses/index.htmlThese pages cost a couple of dollars but they are clearly worth it in my view. I actually bought both without owning a single Nikon or Zeiss lens (actually not true I have an old 28/3.5 PC Nikkor and a couple of "ZA" lenses for my Sonys, but I don't think they count).
As far as Nikon goes it seems that the 14-24/2.8 is a killer lens which may be better than either Nikon or Zeiss primes in most respects. In general Mr. Chambers seems to have found the Zeiss lenses to be superior to Nikon and Canon offerings. Some observations from his test reports_
1) There is a significant sample to sample variation with lenses and the Zeiss ZF-line is no exception to that.
2) Wide angles can be tricky to evaluate because of field curvature issues. The plane of best focus is seldom very flat so when you are shooting 3D targets the field curvature may bend the results, in your favor or not. That said, Mr. Chambers also shot test targets.
Best regards
Erik
Can anyone help me please?
I have just switched from Canon (1DsMk3/5DMk2) to FX Nikon (D3X/D700) because of ongoing technical problems with sensor orientation and AF issues. I am very happy with the new Nikon bodies but I am struggling a bit identifying the best prime wide angle lense to buy. I am looking for a 21/24 mm and a 35mm. Does anyone have any experience of the Zeiss 21 or 25mm lenses. Do they work well with Nikon's electronic rangefinder? Any help would be appreciated.
David Watson