There is a lot written about the differences between the Nikon d300 and the Nikon D3. But what I have not been able to find is a comparison between these two cameras at low ISOs. As a landscape photographer I am not concerned with high iso performance, fast auto focus, multiple card slots etc.... What about comparing two prints shot at the native ISO at say 14x21 inches or so. Would one see any significant advantage over the larger sensor? Ken Rockwell is the only one I could find that addresses this question but I would like to get some other opinions.
