In any case, I do not understand why you feel the need to convince others of your point that dslrs are as good as mfdb or whatever other point you are attempting to make. Why is it important to you? Why does it bother you that I (and others) made the choice to shoot MFDB? I'm not attempting to insult, I'm legitimately curious.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=197527\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Good point! I'd like to answer the question seriously. I have no brand or format loyalty. Cameras are tools, no more, except for the sentimental. We are probably all sentimental to a degree, but we must recognise it as such.
I have no doubt that a modern DB can produce better image quality than a smaller sensor with fewer pixels. Who would argue with that?
When the larger sensor does not have more pixels, then it gets interesting, especially when the larger sensor costs 10,000 or 20,000 dollars and the smaller sensor costs 7 or 8 thousand dollars.
This comparison has never been made... competently.