Hi,
I just got my 2nd copy of the 24-105 lens. I need to replace my 28-135 because the IS makes some funny noise in the cold. I dropped it and my old camera last year.
The new copy is only better than the old lens when stopped down to f8. Even then, it is only marginally better. Wide open, I think the 28-135 is a bit sharper. The images look remarkably similar when not at 100%. Not what I have been expecting. Should I try for copy # 3 or is this what I can expect from this lens. Maybe it cheif attribute is the 24mm wide angle?? Others have raved about it. I have not been too impressed. Especially at 2.5x the price of the old lens. Would appreciate some (more) feed back from others that have this lens.
Not sure if it matters but I am currently shooting with the 400XTi. Maybe this camera is made to mate with the low cost lenses?? (I like to shave weight in my pack)
Constructive comments much appreciated!
Paul