Pages: 1 ... 60 61 [62] 63 64 ... 86   Go Down

Author Topic: Recent Works  (Read 854475 times)

Graham Mitchell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2281
Recent Works
« Reply #1220 on: July 19, 2008, 07:17:48 pm »

From a few hours ago. Rollei 6008AF, Sinar e54LV, first shot is 80mm f2.8 PQS lens at f4, others are 150mm PQS at f5.6, f8.

#1


#2


#3


#4
« Last Edit: July 20, 2008, 01:54:55 pm by foto-z »
Logged

Don Libby

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 824
  • Iron Creek Photography
    • Iron Creek Photography
Recent Works
« Reply #1221 on: July 19, 2008, 07:43:14 pm »

Graham

You’re making me rethink shooting people!  Great work

don

simplify

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 201
Recent Works
« Reply #1222 on: July 23, 2008, 01:40:46 am »

Deadhorse Point Utah.  Sunday evening.  P45+  35mm

[attachment=7585:attachment]
Logged

Frank Doorhof

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1522
    • http://
Recent Works
« Reply #1223 on: July 23, 2008, 02:57:30 pm »

A few from today's session with Ralph.

Mamiya RZ67 ProII, leaf aptus 22

Model : Ralph

1.


2.


3.


4.



Greetings,
Frank
Logged

sid_v

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 69
Recent Works
« Reply #1224 on: July 23, 2008, 03:10:51 pm »

hi frank,

what lenses have u used for these shots?

sid.
Logged

Frank Doorhof

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1522
    • http://
Recent Works
« Reply #1225 on: July 23, 2008, 03:40:57 pm »

180mm f3.5 and 110mm f2.8
Logged

ivokwee

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 35
    • http://www.fotoclublugano.com/~ivo/portfolio
Recent Works
« Reply #1226 on: July 23, 2008, 05:46:08 pm »

I am normally a lurker here. Thanks guys for all the valuable information and nice images in this forum. Last week, I made some nice images during a workshop in Toscana (Italy) with my H1 with 16Mpx Kodak 645 back (yes! some "poor" guys still using it!). Mostly done with the 80mm+1.7x at maximum aperture.

The complete slideshow "Visions of Women" is at http://www.fotoclublugano.com/~ivo/portfolio/tff08 but is a mix with Nikon D2x images. Happy viewing.


« Last Edit: July 23, 2008, 05:47:55 pm by ivokwee »
Logged

rweissman

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18
    • http://
Recent Works
« Reply #1227 on: July 23, 2008, 05:59:42 pm »

I have been thinking of doing a Tuscan workshop, too. Which one was it? Abitavo a Firenze tanti anni fa....

Ron Weissman

Quote
I am normally a lurker here. Thanks guys for all the valuable information and nice images in this forum. Last week, I made some nice images during a workshop in Toscana (Italy) with my H1 with 16Mpx Kodak 645 back (yes! some "poor" guys still using it!). Mostly done with the 80mm+1.7x at maximum aperture.

The complete slideshow "Visions of Women" is at http://www.fotoclublugano.com/~ivo/portfolio/tff08 but is a mix with Nikon D2x images. Happy viewing.



[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=210261\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Logged

ivokwee

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 35
    • http://www.fotoclublugano.com/~ivo/portfolio
Recent Works
« Reply #1228 on: July 23, 2008, 06:50:35 pm »

Quote
I have been thinking of doing a Tuscan workshop, too. Which one was it? Abitavo a Firenze tanti anni fa....

Ron Weissman
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=210266\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Ciao Ron,
The one I went to was www.toscanafotofestival.com (TFF). There is another workshop more famous in Toscana the TPW (www.tpw.it) but also much more expensive. I took a class with Gabriele Rigon. Firenze e vicino!
Logged

robert zimmerman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 226
Recent Works
« Reply #1229 on: July 24, 2008, 04:41:13 am »

from yesterday. big nose job:

Logged

dustblue

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 225
    • http://www.moko.cc/dustblue
Recent Works
« Reply #1230 on: July 24, 2008, 05:15:03 am »

Great works! love the second one.

regards
Dustblue

Quote
from yesterday. big nose job:


[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=210376\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Snook

  • Guest
Recent Works
« Reply #1231 on: July 24, 2008, 09:24:38 am »

Quote
from yesterday. big nose job:


[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=210376\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Nice shot's Kipling
Very Olef Blecker Looking... very similar lighting..
nice Job, what did you shoot it with and at...:+]
Snook
« Last Edit: July 24, 2008, 09:24:57 am by Snook »
Logged

gwhitf

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 855
Recent Works
« Reply #1232 on: July 24, 2008, 09:41:58 am »

Quote
from yesterday. big nose job:

[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Very nice images, and very nice post.

In my eyes, at least in the commercial realm, all of our future successes depends on either your own abilities with post, or your ability to team up with a fine retoucher. that is what will set you apart -- not your choice of camera. Everyone here obsessed with megapixels, or 35 vs MF, and when you see an arresting picture like this, do you think -- "wonder how many megapixels that camera was?" Not a chance in hell. It's about defining a look, and not having the images looked like they just popped out of the camera, untouched. Because, honestly, every one of us who is shooting digital is basically shooting the exact same camera. Digital is digital; in the big picture, all identical, when it pops out of the camera. Untouched, not an ounce of difference -- Hasselblad, Sinar, Phase, Canon, Nikon, whatever. I still insist that the tens of thousands of dollars of difference invested between 35 and MF would be much better spent, searching for a month-long excellent retouching class. You want to change your images? Change your post technique.

(Or, up the content: [a href=\"http://tinyurl.com/5mfyvx)]http://tinyurl.com/5mfyvx)[/url].

Nice images.
« Last Edit: July 24, 2008, 09:48:06 am by gwhitf »
Logged

robert zimmerman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 226
Recent Works
« Reply #1233 on: July 24, 2008, 10:00:29 am »

Thanks,

Snook:
Aptus 22/h2/50mm@5,6 & 1/250th with Profoto packs and heads. All with Magnum reflectors straight on , one umbrella fill and two lights for the background and side back light.

gwhitf:
Thanks, agree to a certain extent. Light is certainly more important than which sensor you're using (but it should and needs to serve the purpose of enabling you to work successfully - software, buffer,   ISO, etc.) , and having a bit of an idea involved in the shot is also something that I think is very important.

When I think fashion I think Tim Walker. Brilliant ideas, brilliant light, brilliant setting. What he shot it with is probably irrelevant. It worked because he made it work.
« Last Edit: July 24, 2008, 10:01:02 am by kipling »
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 25122
Recent Works
« Reply #1234 on: July 24, 2008, 10:04:48 am »

Quote
But (and a big butt) ... back then it was not a competition, like it has become now. Photographers were *selected* as Hasselblad Masters.

Quite different i would say.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=168880\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Different? Crucial!

Rob C

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 25122
Recent Works
« Reply #1235 on: July 24, 2008, 10:28:38 am »

Quote
Thanks guys, I'm lucky to have one of the top vintage vehicle restorers a block from my studio.  Jim
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=179926\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

As I have an Escort just celebrating its 10th birthday, perhaps it might be handy to have the name of your car restorer?

Just kidding - great pics!

Rob C

SecondFocus

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 526
    • SecondFocus
Recent Works
« Reply #1236 on: July 24, 2008, 10:28:47 am »

Good forum post!

Quote
Very nice images, and very nice post.

In my eyes, at least in the commercial realm, all of our future successes depends on either your own abilities with post, or your ability to team up with a fine retoucher. that is what will set you apart -- not your choice of camera. Everyone here obsessed with megapixels, or 35 vs MF, and when you see an arresting picture like this, do you think -- "wonder how many megapixels that camera was?" Not a chance in hell. It's about defining a look, and not having the images looked like they just popped out of the camera, untouched. Because, honestly, every one of us who is shooting digital is basically shooting the exact same camera. Digital is digital; in the big picture, all identical, when it pops out of the camera. Untouched, not an ounce of difference -- Hasselblad, Sinar, Phase, Canon, Nikon, whatever. I still insist that the tens of thousands of dollars of difference invested between 35 and MF would be much better spent, searching for a month-long excellent retouching class. You want to change your images? Change your post technique.

(Or, up the content: http://tinyurl.com/5mfyvx).

Nice images.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=210406\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Logged
Ian L. Sitren
[url=http://SecondFocus.co

gwhitf

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 855
Recent Works
« Reply #1237 on: July 24, 2008, 11:06:10 am »

Quote
Aptus 22/h2/50mm@5,6 & 1/250th with Profoto packs and heads. All with Magnum reflectors straight on , one umbrella fill and two lights for the background and side back light.

... And don't forget the Liquify filter!
Logged

ron203

  • Guest
Recent Works
« Reply #1238 on: July 24, 2008, 11:21:28 am »

http://bluefly.com/pages/custom/custom.jsp...yp%3D&objType=2

Use the blue scroll bar to see the rest.

And here is some video from the shoot:
http://flypaper.bluefly.com/archives/2008/...xclusive-b.html

(sorry, but this was a Canon shoot. Er, and the designers made her skin a little too saturated...)
« Last Edit: July 24, 2008, 11:52:50 am by ron203 »
Logged

Anthony R

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 252
Recent Works
« Reply #1239 on: July 24, 2008, 11:39:39 am »

HE RETURNS! Welcome back.

Quote
http://bluefly.com/pages/custom/custom.jsp...yp%3D&objType=2

Use the blue scroll bar to see the rest.

And here is some video from the shoot:
http://flypaper.bluefly.com/archives/2008/...xclusive-b.html

(sorry, but this was a Canon shoot.)
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=210429\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 60 61 [62] 63 64 ... 86   Go Up