Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Are they equally good  (Read 2798 times)

once2work

  • Guest
Are they equally good
« on: October 31, 2007, 07:05:00 am »

At last, Canon DPP come out the update it support Mac 10.4.10 it support 40D. But I can't wait and brought the Bibble Pro, it is good. Just like to know, between Bibble, Canon DPP and ACR, are they equally good, or DPP more suitable for 40D. I found Bibble Pro is very user friendly that I was struggle with LR.
Logged

Josh-H

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2086
    • Wild Nature Photo Travel
Are they equally good
« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2007, 07:09:24 am »

Quote
At last, Canon DPP come out the update it support Mac 10.4.10 it support 40D. But I can't wait and brought the Bibble Pro, it is good. Just like to know, between Bibble, Canon DPP and ACR, are they equally good, or DPP more suitable for 40D. I found Bibble Pro is very user friendly that I was struggle with LR.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=149760\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Almost impossible to answer this - its really about user preference.

LR has serious workflow advantages.
DPP seems to give me the best RAW conversions with the least amount of effort.
ACR - same engine as LR - good conversions, good workflow, but I prefer DPP conversions.
Bible - havent used it.

thats my 2 cents.
Logged
Wild Nature Photo Travel

bjanes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3387
Are they equally good
« Reply #2 on: October 31, 2007, 10:43:07 am »

Quote
Bible - havent used it.

thats my 2 cents.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=149762\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

So, you have not been to church lately?  
Logged

Mark D Segal

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12525
    • http://www.markdsegal.com
Are they equally good
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2007, 03:01:09 pm »

I had the privilege of being a presenter on Andrew Rodney's Iron Chef's panel at Photo Plus Expo in New York City several weeks ago. The bulk of the session was about displaying the use of four raw converters in real-time on images provided by two world-famous photographers. Dennis Reggie and Vincent LeForet provided the images, and representatives of Lightroom, Bibble, Aperture and Phase worked these images using their software under the supervision of the two photographers. One could watch the images developing in real-time on a huge screen, and Epson provided a 3800 printer with Super A3 Premium Luster paper for printing the results. Importantly, the session was not structured to pick winners or losers, but simply to show the state-of-the-art with four of the key raw converters. The images were very challenging (on purpose) and the two photographers were truly impressed with the quality of all the converters. They all work in different ways,  they have different user interfaces, and the adjustments made to the same image accross the four applications were not exactly the same, so after examining some of the prints I cam away with the impression that all this software is very good, the more controlling factors being the skill and preferences of the user. By the way, all of them have free trial downloads, so you can try before you buy.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2007, 03:01:40 pm by MarkDS »
Logged
Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....."

tomrock

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 247
    • http://tomrockwell.com
Are they equally good
« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2007, 06:30:05 am »

Choosing a raw converter is like choosing a film -- they all work, but you're going to get different looks from them. Some you'll like and some you won't. You really have to make the decision yourself.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up