Jonathan,
Do you really have a point or are you simply showing more ignorance?
If I posted images from every digital camera I own and use or have owned and used over the years would that make you happy? LOL..
The site you apparently visited is a sample site with images from a few cameras which I find interesting. The CP990 and CP950 because of their use in digiscoping, the Sony DKC-ID1 and DSC-D700, a few Olympus models because of their place in history, the Canon D30 because it was Canon's first dSLR, the Canon 1D because it was Canon's first Pro-body. The Sigma SD9 and SD10 and Sony R1 because of their place in digital camera history.
I test cameras and peripherals for manufacturers and have done so for many, many years. I currently have over 30 digital cameras ranging from professional bodies to consumer level digicams. Some of the links are very old with images dating back to the 90's. I have used and discarded or sold another 30 or more over the years.
My customers don't even visit my samples site and could care less which equipment I use. They are only concerned with results and they pay me very well for giving them that.
In answer to your earlier question - yes, well over 100K images and well before 1970. In 1960 alone over 30K frames.
You appear to be a half way intelligent boy, if you would spend a bit of your time and intelligence actually "reading" what I said rather than trying to demonstrate the extent of your "knowledge" you would immediately see that you have misquoted me, constructed a straw man argument from your misquotes, and displayed your ignorance based on your misconceptions.
You are wrong about the comparative resolution of the SD9/SD10 viz CFA counterparts. Period... Numerous testers who do this for a living disagree with your conclusions and have concrete "proof" of their findings.
Impress you? Don't flatter yourself. I could care less whether you are impressed. Color moire with cameras having AA filters? Yes, in every case. I won't waste my time producing a sample using my 1DS (since you appear to have this camera) photographing a herringbone suit coat to demonstrate just how "easy" it is to produce color moire with the 1DS. Making statements like you made (120,000 frames - no moire) simply tells anyone with any true experience with this issue that you either have no clue or you have never shot subjects prone to moire. Some software companies have made a fortune creating software to ameliorate color moire for cameras with AA filters as well as for cameras without AA filters.
Don't bother replying unless you simply want to attempt to impress others with your vast knowledge of optical physics because this is my last comment on this issue.
Concerning the Foveon processor you simply have no clue.
Lin
Rather curious statements, since your Canon image sample page only has D30 images, and your Nikon image sample page has only Coolpix 990 samples. And your Recent Images page only has 10D and 1D samples. If your web site is intended to impress your clients, you might want to let them know you have something better than the Canon 10D, 1D, and D30 (only one of which breaks the 6MP barrier) and a 3.3MP Nikon point-and-shoot, all of which are several generations old technologically. And your site makes no mention and has no samples of anything shot with any Kodak or other brand pro bodies.
If these cameras are the straw man you're arguing against WRT Bayer sensors, I'm NOT impressed.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=148746\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]