I must agree with Alain and nicolaasdb. This is way off the track. Some of the language here is even past Ann Coulter, Randi Rhodes, Rush Limbaugh, and Rosie ODonnell. It's not funny, entertaining or even relevant to a sane discussion of what is art. I must say I was shocked to see such a turmoil over a simple picture, which when I first saw it, I thought, "interesting, captivating eyes." And I must say, the "provocative" nature of the title escaped me. I thought it was possibly her real name. Duh! If I follow the logic of some of these righteous-types, they would object to Steve McCurry's famous picture of Sharbat Gula that graced the cover of National Geographic over 20 years ago. After all, most Pashtuns are probably not particularly happy about their young girls having their pictures plastered all over western magazines. But even after 20 years Sharbat and her family didn't understand all the fuss, so the story goes. Maybe in 20 years "Lolita" will be equally nonplussed. Wouldn't it be funny if she grew up to be a photojournalist! Can we move on now, please.