Hi folks. I'm surprised to see LuLa publishing nonsense like this "review". We all know that Leica still makes some superb cameras and lenses (and other optics), and that they also sell other not-so superb products made partly or largely by others in order to pad their profits. People presumably buy these dubious items to bask in the cachet of the famous brand. Fine, let people buy what they want; but why does The Luminous Landscape have to share features like this completely subjective blurb that includes gems like a "comparison chart" which assumes the body and lens are superior to the equivalent Fujifilm product without apparently testing or using either?
