The vast majority of all film scanning volume* done today is being done on camera-based scanners. Much (most?) of that with our system specifically. Far better detail (SFR resolution), dynamic range (noise/bit-depth), color (deltaE,
resistance to spectral metamerism, modern
emulsion-agnostic profiling), safety (non-contact holders, low temp, no UV), archive suitability (linear files rather than baked-in adjustments) and speed (hundreds of times faster than using a flatbed).
For example Disney is programmatically digitizing all ~5 million of their photographic slides in a room filled with our "scanners". The life work of Irving Penn, Ansel Adams, Edward Weston, Joel Meyerowitz and dozens more are done with our tech. The vast majority of major US museum, library, and archive.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4-Kdq_l25QNote that our systems are not necessarily a great replacement for a cheap Epson for a casual hobbyist to scan a few occasional rolls they shoot. But more "consumer" oriented options are out there from a variety of companies and many of them are quite decent for their price.
If you're scanning film on a flatbed, just stop. Switch to camera-based; it was the "future" 15 years ago.
*Hobbyists are the vast majority of people doing film scanning, but volume wise they do hundreds of frames per year... our institutional clients are doing hundreds of thousands of frames per year or more.