Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Street without People?  (Read 176 times)

Chris Kern

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1988
    • Chris Kern's Eponymous Website
Street without People?
« on: March 28, 2022, 06:15:15 pm »

Is this street?  I confess I'm uncertain, but I've argued in the past that anything alive which is interacting with his/her/its environment plausibly could qualify.  That's my story and I guess I'm stuck with it.

Hidden Buddha, Crouching Squirrel




In any event, I couldn't resist.  At least it's not a cat picture.

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12999
Re: Street without People?
« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2022, 06:20:08 am »

I cannot comment on street or not street but I like it very much. The Buddha seems unimpressed, though!
Logged
Francois

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22661
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Street without People?
« Reply #2 on: March 29, 2022, 12:17:29 pm »

The Buddha thinks it's funny.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Chris Kern

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1988
    • Chris Kern's Eponymous Website
Re: Street without People?
« Reply #3 on: March 29, 2022, 01:24:57 pm »

The Buddha seems unimpressed . . .

The Buddha thinks it's funny.

If a fundamental characteristic of "street photography" is ambiguity, it seems that you gents have answered my question.
Pages: [1]   Go Up