Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Multnomah Falls  (Read 218 times)

Two23

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 827
Multnomah Falls
« on: November 24, 2021, 11:18:44 pm »

The photo everybody takes. 

Chamonix 45n, Darlot Petzval FL=4 inch c.1858, Efke 25.  ISO 25/f16/8s. 4x5


Kent in SD
Logged
Qui sedes ad dexteram Patris,
miserere nobis.

Paulo Bizarro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6950
    • http://www.paulobizarro.com
Re: Multnomah Falls
« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2021, 03:04:22 am »

Seems to be a little fuzzy?

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22375
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Multnomah Falls
« Reply #2 on: November 25, 2021, 10:36:23 am »

Nice.
Taken by a drone, or is there another bridge farther back?
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

degrub

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1773
Re: Multnomah Falls
« Reply #3 on: November 25, 2021, 10:45:46 am »

nice shot with that lens. like its character
Might want to dodge the burnout areas of the bridge a bit, maybe the foliage in the upper right to keep the eye on the water and bridge.
Logged

Two23

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 827
Re: Multnomah Falls
« Reply #4 on: November 25, 2021, 07:11:01 pm »

Nice.
Taken by a drone, or is there another bridge farther back?


Just from the viewing stand.  I used some front rise on the camera.  The 1858 lens was made for portraits and not shooting at infinity.


Kent in SD
Logged
Qui sedes ad dexteram Patris,
miserere nobis.
Pages: [1]   Go Up