I think the Adobe Super Resolution algorithm has changed the game big time. I am super impressed, and pretty happy, because, suddenly, My XT3 captures are greatly improved. I go no bigger than a 17 inch Epson P800, and really do not want to, because, well, enough is enough in space and material needed for such sizes. I am in this for the pleasure of it all, not to make money. I have worked with 24 and 44 inch Epsons in studios, and, no thanks for the home. If I ever want something bigger, well, I'll just make a proof and say, match it, to the printmaker.
Never worked with the large Fuji 100s or similar, but, I did do a weekly rental of a Sony Ar7iV early in the pandemic, and, well, very nice camera, beautiful files, but, the larger lens just made me appreciate my smaller Fuji lenses, a lot. I tend to walk five miles a day, sometimes more, on European jaunts and hike for miles in nature, and, the less weight, the better. The XT3 with the little 16-80 just fits in my hand so nicely, too. I almost dropped the Sony setup a few times. I couldn't imagine using the Fuji except for images that I didn't have to walk or hike very far to, so, at that expense, eh, no thanks, not yet. Still not versatile. If Adobe continues to improve it's AI development, and come up with a Super Duper Resolution, which, I bet they will, I can stay at the smaller ASPC body and lens size, and make prints that are, well, compared to the best film technology pre digital, superb. Then I can just concentrate on making beautiful prints, at an affordable price. Maybe the digital race is over, and this is as good as it has to be. But, ha, maybe just...a...little...better? Keep the body and lens size, though.