To me the problem with both the 32mm and 40mm Rodenstocks, is retrofocus distortion. Objects towards the edge of the frame elongate and flatten. Very easy to see with car tires, trash cans, telephone poles, net anything with "known" dimensions. The 32mm I have is worse than my 40mm, but both lenses exhibit it to some degree. This is not correctable in C1, LR, or any other software I have tried. If you shift the lenses, especially the 32mm, you will see if even more as you have pushed the limit of the optical design by moving to the edge of the IC.
40mm is much lighter, does not need a CF for best capture, as the 32mm does. Both have 90mm IC's as I recall. Both will show a hard vignetting as you hit the edge of the image circle, due to the IC indicator placed in the lens by Rodenstock. The Schneider lenses will not show the hard vignette, only a slight much more manageable one.
Rodenstock may have worked on the issue of the retrofocus distortion with newer copies, my lenses date back to 2016 and 2015.
Paul