... what did you think of his photos? Did you see both his digital and film prints?
I didn't notice the separation in the gallery of digital vs. film.
As for his photography, I have mixed feelings. They are really impressive in all their enormous sizes, but reduced to a thumbnail or postcard, they are much less impressive, almost banal. The attractiveness lies in incredible details that 8x10 camera and 10' enlargements offer.
In his defense (if any needed), it is also incredible challenging to shoot the Everglades. It is often a huge mess of details, and hard to find appropriate composition. Color saves the day sometimes, though not for him.
Here are a couple of my attempts: