Still no luck with LR10

[john beardsworth]

If a company the size of C1 (equivalent to Adobe's meeting catering budget) and in Europe can monitor this site Adobe can, but it doesn't have to. It's their choice.Adobe consider this site too small to bother with, C1 don't. Company choices, Adobe won't suffer.

Adobe do look at this forum, and you'll sometimes see posts from Rikk Flohr or even Tom Hogarty here. Information may also be filtered to them by forum members who have Adobe NDAs. But there's a difference between looking and monitoring, and from Adobe's viewpoint it's not a support forum.

[kers]

On the support forum for years many people asked to undo the automatic apply of lensprofiling.
Just now they start doing it, but only for new cameras.
So not for the nikon z7 and z6 but only for the z7II  and z6II  that share the same lenses and sensors... ...Not happy

[digitaldog]

Adobe do look at this forum, and you'll sometimes see posts from Rikk Flohr or even Tom Hogarty here. Information may also be filtered to them by forum members who have Adobe NDAs. But there's a difference between looking and monitoring, and from Adobe's viewpoint it's not a support forum.

Indeed, and Adobe isn't the only ones getting pushback here:
https://forum.luminous-landscape.com/index.php?topic=135406.0

Note, Capture One employees do post on Luminous Landscape forums.

A dealer does and that's great. But that doesn't change the push back from C1 posters here so.... Maybe LuLa isn't the ideal or even correct place to get anything other than user to user support/feedback.

[digitaldog]

On the support forum for years many people asked to undo the automatic apply of lensprofiling.

It's easy to do, and could be done for years, the exception recently is with 'built in' Lens Profiles for some mirrorless cameras. There are hacks around that too.

[Chris Kern]

It's easy to do, and could be done for years, the exception recently is with 'built in' Lens Profiles for some mirrorless cameras. There are hacks around that too.

Apropos of which, this works tolerably well, at least on the files emitted by my Fuji cameras.

[RikkFlohr]

If a company the size of C1 (equivalent to Adobe's meeting catering budget) and in Europe can monitor this site Adobe can, but it doesn't have to. It's their choice.Adobe consider this site too small to bother with, C1 don't. Company choices, Adobe won't suffer.

We do monitor.

The link from Andrews Post: https://www.adobe.com/products/wishform.html is out of date. 
Feature now requests go here: https://feedback.photoshop.com/topics/lightroom-classic/5f5f2093785c1f1e6cc40872?cType=IDEA&page=1

[zobelaudio]

Why is it taking so long to fix this ?
there are so many people who have this bug, so it's not just a handful and we pay good money every month to use this software.
How can it be, that such a major bug can be introduced with a full number update and no fix for more than 8 weeks ?
please Adobe try to explain.

[digitaldog]

Why is it taking so long to fix this ?

One concept: Adobe doesn't care and they are spending time twiddling their collective fingers.
The other fact: This is a very difficult bug to track down as it was never seen or reported by pre-release members, it's based on some very odd and specific hardware configurations and, one part of the interaction that's causing issues isn't part of Adobe's code (much more I can't say under NDA).
A fix is in the works, but this one's a really tricky bug.
You plead and please is in effect, they ARE working quite diligently on a fix.

Why, after two major OS updates, can I still not get Time Machine to work in Apple Mail. Been like, years!

[zobelaudio]

Thx Andrew, I'll be patient and trust, after all it's Christmas...

[kers]

...
Why, after two major OS updates, can I still not get Time Machine to work in Apple Mail. Been like, years!

Are you saying Time machine will not backup mail ? ( user/library/mail )

[digitaldog]

Are you saying Time machine will not backup mail ? ( user/library/mail )

No, but recovery is much more difficult and has been for me and others for awhile.
You used to be able to go into Apple Mail itself, click on a mailbox and then use TM to go back and recover. That doesn't work all the time, often it doesn't work at all. It used to.
Now if you want to go back, you have to futz with the individual mail items, if you can find them, outside of Apple Mail.
This has been discussed on the Apple support forums for ages, it's still broken, at least for me and others. Perhaps not everyone and again, this goes back to the Adobe bug that's difficult to find and fix because it's not affecting the majority of users. 

[D Fuller]

Hi guys,
I have now installed and deinstalled LR10 three times, with no luck getting it to work fluidly. Each move of the mouse or click in the interface gives me the spinning ball. 9.4 works fine. Any ideas what could be causing this ? I am still on Mojave.
Please help
cheers
Stephan

I've just solved this same problem by turning off GPU acceleration (preferences/perforance tab). Took a long session with an Adobe tech to get there. I'm running Mojave on a 201 MacPro. He suggested that I update to Big Sur, thinking it might solve the problem.

[kers]

I've just solved this same problem by turning off GPU acceleration (preferences/perforance tab). Took a long session with an Adobe tech to get there. I'm running Mojave on a 201 MacPro. He suggested that I update to Big Sur, thinking it might solve the problem.

Big Sur will bring new problems- for one ; not able to run 32 bits programs...
Turning off the GPU will make LR clearly slower...
I would go back to the 9. version if that is a valid option.

[D Fuller]

Big Sur will bring new problems- for one ; not able to run 32 bits programs...
Turning off the GPU will make LR clearly slower...
I would go back to the 9. version if that is a valid option.

All this might just push me to replace LR with C1. I have always used C1 for tethered shooting, but have liked some of LR’s workflow features. I can’t update the OS without breaking a piece of 32-bit software that I use for LTO tape backup for a 100TB video asset library. Replacing that system would cost about $10K.

There is a 2-month-old thread on the Adobe support forum about similar problems with LR if you’re running a custom monitor profile (anything other than sRGB or Adobe RGB). It’s possible that’s part of my issue, as I run a profiled Eizo 319. I haven’t tested yet. That seems like rather a long time for Adobe to fail to fix something so essential for professional work.

[kers]

I am on a hackintosh and seem to have no problems on Mojave... knock knock.
I have tried C1 a couple of times but like the workflow of LR better.
Have to dive into LR to find out if it can be a replacement for culling (mediaPro) as well... i only use it to develop my photos - use my own flexible 'DAMM' since 1982 (!)
What i noticed is that output may be better on both depending on the type of photo.