Am I correct in assuming that perhaps when scanning without a holder it would be better to use the Epson Fluid Mount Accessory in stead of placing the film directly on the scanner glass/platen. In theory the height of the Fluid Mount glass should be correct, while perhaps the scanner glass may not be, since it's not designed to handle film as opposed reflective materials. More testing coming probably.
Recently I did some testing with a V750, comparing Epson Fluid Mount Accessory + KAMI vs. scanner glass + KAMI. I scanned 135 and 120 negs with VueScan.
My findings:
- Wet mounting helps reducing scratches etc, thus speeding up post production.
- Scans from the glass/platen were - in my case - not as sharp as those from EFMA (which I adjusted in height with small amounts of tape to achieve max. sharpness).
- VueScan offered me 4800 dpi when using the platen, 6000 dpi when using the film holder - but I did not see much difference between those two resolutions. Using 6000 dpi seemed to add more noise than data.
- Sharpening in post (be it Sharpen AI, Lightroom, PixelGenius...) was essential, regardless of whether I used glass or EFMA.
- And finally: Using a good camera/macro lens on a repro stand is considerably faster :-)