Dan,
Hard to compete with the convenience, for sure. But how does the delivered product compare with the quality of your work? If it is genuinely equivalent, you’re in for a rough ride. But I’m guessing that the dictum that something can always be done a little worse, a lot cheaper, might apply here. Why not test for yourself? Put some images up, have them delivered to you and see what they look like compared to your equivalent product. Assuming you have a distinct quality advantage, that’s something you can market to the clients who are thinking of abandoning ship for a POD service. You’ll have “hard copy” proof of a superior product.
In an age of “good enough” - and if the POD product is “good enough” it is just evidence that our mass media, mass pop culture society has taken one more step toward uniform mediocrity.
My little (and I mean “little”) print studio survives on being a niche operation where the business model is a literal “sit down with the photographer here in my studio” as we optimize file for printing, talk about intention, talk about possible improvement in the “presence” in the printed image based on file modification. Then on to paper selection, careful soft proof with the client participating, hard proofing, and final print and approval. From that point on, I can do a kind of print on demand for those images that they’ve approved, but are most often shipped to the artist for their own distribution. This obviously limits my potential for penetration into a large client base. Artists/photographers have to either be local, or willing to travel for sessions. The clients I do have LOVE what I do. But it’s certainly not a practical model.
Rand