OK, I get it now. Lemme be sure:
By your measure (and the rest of the right side of the spectrum) nearly everybody (the media and academia) is wrong except talk radio?
If we had journalists like we did in years past, only giving us the facts without editorializing it, I would say no.
But today's word is more complicated, since so many journalists have decided to engage in editorializing. It happens on the right as well, but the left really engages in it. Baquet of the NYTs even said as much a couple of years ago; he said that you can no longer be only objective in the era of Trump and needed to editorialize the news now. This, obviously, not only destroys the news by creating bias in the language that it uses, but opens up the possibility media outlets will engage in yellow journalism if it suits their biases.
The NYTs gives us two great examples of this, recently. The Doctor whom they said was fired because he opposed hydroxychloroquine turned out to be false. Politico did only miminal reporting to find the real story, and it turned out he was just an asshole that needed to be fired. Additionally, another is the rather poor excuse Baquet used to justify the lack of coverage on the Biden assault charge when they went overboard on the Kavanaugh one, even though Reid is more credible then Ford.
There is biases like this all over the place in the news, most often in the direction of the left. This is why so many journalistic watch dog groups constantly give political coverage a poor review.
PS, why dont you stop contorting my words to fit your bias and actually try to understand what I am saying. You're turning into the New York Times.
