But that's where everyone goes these days. Nobody there could give a flying... about image quality (compression, sharpness, etc.). It is all about content quality... as it should be.
That's a very blinkered approach to photographic judgement. It may have a place in news photography, but other than that, if you are claiming that nothing else matters except content, I respectfully disagree. Execution is a massive part of differentiating between being there and making the best of being there, wherever the fabled "content" may happen to be residing that day.
Referring to Keiths post; I would have imagined that as so much of his work depends on skillful execution, on buying the very best tools and lenses that he can find for his trade, using a professionally calibrated monitor, that it would be the last place he'd want to hang his work.
Early in life I went through the experience of falling foul of a printer who delivered a shitty version of a calendar I'd produced. It was not a gratifying experience, and waving original, approved proofs did nothing to resolve the year-long moment.
No, Slobodan, that is most certainly
not as it should be.
Rob
