Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: ridges  (Read 86 times)

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8054
ridges
« on: October 05, 2019, 12:01:07 pm »

?

Jeremy
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17778
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: ridges
« Reply #1 on: October 05, 2019, 08:55:13 pm »

Very fine.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

degrub

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1156
Re: ridges
« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2019, 09:27:07 pm »

Very fine
Back side of
A chorus line.
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17778
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: ridges
« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2019, 08:42:07 am »

Very fine
Back side of
A chorus line.
Right on!
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22711
Re: ridges
« Reply #4 on: October 06, 2019, 09:05:49 am »

Yes! That's the kind of detail shot that says so much more on so many different levels; proof of that, in the chorus girls analogy.

You can't often get the mind to travel into itself when looking at a broader scene. I think I mentioned somewhere here that I figured the wide-angle lens did few favours for landscape photography. Sure, a lot for "wish you were here" productions, but that's something else.

Rob
« Last Edit: October 06, 2019, 10:08:29 am by Rob C »
Logged

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5837
Re: ridges
« Reply #5 on: October 06, 2019, 09:51:07 am »

Interesting.
Pages: [1]   Go Up