So I have two copies of a Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 for my Nikon D3300. I wanted to compare the two so I printed out this chart (
https://digital-photography-school.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/test-chart.pdf) and set my camera up on a tripod. I tested each lens at 17mm, going from f/2.8, 7.1, 11, 13, and 22. I set the camera close enough to fill the frame and used autofocus, then the lcd to double check focus. I repeated with the other lens, and then repeated the whole test at 50mm as well.
What I want to know is if this is a
reasonable test to gauge which lens to keep. I also got some really interesting results that I don't quite understand. One of this biggest oddities was the light transmission. On one lens, the camera was consistently exposing for shorter exposures at the same aperture. The most extreme examples were at f/22, one lens was consistently taking exposures multiple seconds longer (as much as an extra 10 seconds at 50mm). Viewing the histograms in Lightroom, the exposures are fairly similar. To confirm the exposures weren't just 'different', the one lens had many exposures that were brighter, and shorter shutters. What could cause this? And yes, this was taken indoors under a light, so that shouldn't have changed from shot to shot.
I'm also verifying that nothing could've been wrong with my focus. In each test I only focused on the first test at f/2.8, and then left that alone as I changed my aperture. My first lens was very sharp through the image at f/2.8, but then got increasingly soft after f/7.1. My other lens was horribly soft in the lower right at f/2.8, but then impressively sharp throughout the whole image from f/7.1 onwards. Are these just fairly standard variances to expect from lens to lens, or should I consider repeating with different conditions or tests?