Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: wet zone  (Read 524 times)

sarrasani

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 471
wet zone
« on: August 12, 2019, 06:48:23 pm »

Vogtlander Color-Skoparex 35 mm.   and  Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 20 mm. early version (f/4) with Sigma Sd Quattro H.
Slight editing. Enjoy them if you want, and thank you for attention.
All the best,
sandro
Logged
Film cameras (13X18, 2,4X3,6), digital-foveon and digital-mosaic cameras.
Only manual focus lenses.

sdwilsonsct

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3282
Re: wet zone
« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2019, 03:13:49 am »

2 is my favourite.

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12551
Re: wet zone
« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2019, 07:38:50 am »

I like the mood of this set. #2 is great but I cannot choose between #3 and #4.
Well seen.
Logged
Francois

Jeremy Roussak

  • On Probation
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: wet zone
« Reply #3 on: August 14, 2019, 07:44:43 am »

Logged

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5881
Re: wet zone
« Reply #4 on: August 14, 2019, 07:49:21 am »

Number 1. Good clarity.

Bob_B

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3181
  • Ergo cat notium
    • Nature's Beauty Revealed
Re: wet zone
« Reply #5 on: August 14, 2019, 08:06:02 am »

The second one for me as well.
Logged
Nature's Beauty Revealed
www.belasphoto.com

RMW

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 780
Re: wet zone
« Reply #6 on: August 14, 2019, 10:17:25 am »

Nice use of the Foveon sensor for the B&Ws.
Richard
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22375
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: wet zone
« Reply #7 on: August 14, 2019, 03:58:39 pm »

The second for me.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

sarrasani

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 471
Re: wet zone
« Reply #8 on: August 16, 2019, 09:14:37 am »

2 is my favourite.

Thank you much for attention and for your choice (probably also mine).
all the best!
Sandro
Logged
Film cameras (13X18, 2,4X3,6), digital-foveon and digital-mosaic cameras.
Only manual focus lenses.

sarrasani

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 471
Re: wet zone
« Reply #9 on: August 16, 2019, 09:17:28 am »

I like the mood of this set. #2 is great but I cannot choose between #3 and #4.
Well seen.

Thank you! Nothing special.....but the light/scene situation was IMHO fascinating, and these old toys (lenses) made their honest work.
All the best!
Sandro
Logged
Film cameras (13X18, 2,4X3,6), digital-foveon and digital-mosaic cameras.
Only manual focus lenses.

sarrasani

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 471
Re: wet zone
« Reply #10 on: August 16, 2019, 09:18:12 am »

Mine too.

Jeremy

Thank you much, and all the best,
Sandro
Logged
Film cameras (13X18, 2,4X3,6), digital-foveon and digital-mosaic cameras.
Only manual focus lenses.

sarrasani

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 471
Re: wet zone
« Reply #11 on: August 16, 2019, 09:19:18 am »

Number 1. Good clarity.

You are very kind stamper. Thank you and all the best,
Sandro
Logged
Film cameras (13X18, 2,4X3,6), digital-foveon and digital-mosaic cameras.
Only manual focus lenses.

sarrasani

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 471
Re: wet zone
« Reply #12 on: August 16, 2019, 09:20:32 am »

The second one for me as well.

Thank you much Bob_B!
all the best,
sandro
Logged
Film cameras (13X18, 2,4X3,6), digital-foveon and digital-mosaic cameras.
Only manual focus lenses.

sarrasani

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 471
Re: wet zone
« Reply #13 on: August 16, 2019, 09:26:55 am »

Nice use of the Foveon sensor for the B&Ws.
Richard

I like and I use different brand cameras (last Sony and Canon) and I like also also film cameras (Minolta Dynax9, fantastic camera !).
But this Foveon has something special (not only in the better sense....), and IMHO it's better the "old" 1-1-1 foveon (Merrils or sd1 for example, but also the next FF, it seems.....) than the actual "Quattro" evolution.
Very satisfiyng, both for colours (in certain conditions) and especially for monochrome. The edges and the microcontrast are really more
like film than mosaic sensors. 
All the best for you and thank you for attention,
Sandro
Logged
Film cameras (13X18, 2,4X3,6), digital-foveon and digital-mosaic cameras.
Only manual focus lenses.

sarrasani

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 471
Re: wet zone
« Reply #14 on: August 16, 2019, 09:27:30 am »

The second for me.

Thank you Eric! All the best,
Sandro
Logged
Film cameras (13X18, 2,4X3,6), digital-foveon and digital-mosaic cameras.
Only manual focus lenses.

Ivo_B

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1063
    • www.ivophoto.be
Re: wet zone
« Reply #15 on: August 18, 2019, 12:06:04 pm »

Number 3 for me. A honest image, ....
Logged

sarrasani

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 471
Re: wet zone
« Reply #16 on: August 20, 2019, 10:14:46 am »

Number 3 for me. A honest image, ....

thank you much!
All the best,
Sandro
Logged
Film cameras (13X18, 2,4X3,6), digital-foveon and digital-mosaic cameras.
Only manual focus lenses.
Pages: [1]   Go Up