Following.

[stamper]

Definitely Street?

[Ivo_B]

Definitely Street?

Don’t know about the genre, but I like it.

[KLaban]

Sinister. I like it.

[Eric Myrvaagnes]

Yes.

[petermfiore]

Great photo....you should be very happy with this image.


Peter

[Martin Kristiansen]

Great image.

[RSL]

Another winner, Robert.

[degrub]

Don’t know about the genre, but I like it.

Form following Function ?

[Jeremy Roussak]

Definitely Street?

Street noir.

Jeremy

[32BT]

Definitely Street?

Most definitely, and very good at that. Just enough drawing to tell the story. No more, no less. Very evocative and like K said; maybe a bit sinister. Yet it also depicts true allure. That ambiguity! The female attraction and the male attention, all in one picture, and due to its rendering we can't tell which type of attention, so we are forced to think about it. Teaches us something about life.

Truest street if ever I saw it.

[KLaban]

Most definitely, and very good at that. Just enough drawing to tell the story. No more, no less. Very evocative and like K said; maybe a bit sinister. Yet it also depicts true allure. That ambiguity! The female attraction and the male attention, all in one picture, and due to its rendering we can't tell which type of attention, so we are forced to think about it. Teaches us something about life.

Truest street if ever I saw it.

Well, there's another one, Truest Street.

;-)

[Jeremy Roussak]

Well, there's another one, Truest Street.

Dear God, no!

Jeremy

[32BT]

Hehe, if LuLa has taught me one thing it's that genre definitions apparently come in graduated forms, which, if you think about it, is perhaps not entirely incomprehensible on a photography forum.

[Arlen]

Very engaging, and I really like the way you processed it.

[stamper]

Thanks to all for the positive feedback.

[francois]

It's another stunning shot. Backlit is perfectly handled and the result is excellent.
It's a winner.