Ok, I think you’re going too far. I replied and gave arguments, screenshots and answers to every single critic that you told me; all I see from you is a person that simply jumps to another new small detail to criticize when I reply to the last one. And in this your last post, you're laughing about the project I've been working slowly for 4 years.
So the
before's examples are using what target and built by you as custom camera profiles with what software? Did I miss that answer? If so, I apologize. Please clarify or point me to that text.
Let me tell you something, Andrew: when I came here to share this my project, I expected to have a nice discussion with many experts here.
That might have been a mistake as you've seen.
A discussion on where some would like my chart and some don’t.
I don't have enough data to tell you if I like or dislike it. Just like you don't have enough data to tell us how many pro photographers ALL use C1.
I will totally respect their opinion, of course, but as well as I would never throw shit over other person’s project, I expect them to not do that to me.
Shit? was thrown at the
before and
after examples as interpreted. Again, is the
before image on your site a
custom profile and if so, using what current target?
There always should be a respect for others work, because we can all discuss without going low.
Respect is earned.
So now you’re telling me that the everything else in the image looks 'WORSE'. And you laugh
I believe I made clear what I subjectively saw of that
one image and what looked '
better' and all the rest that looked worse. The paper trail of my comments remain here to see.
Please show me the paper trail of yours, that perhaps I missed, that describes how your "
before" examples were built using a
CUSTOM camera profile as a comparison to the custom profile examples made with your target.
You might not seen the answer and images of the CC24 I've already posted, on where it can be seen that the profiled capture is almost spot on.
OT
But after you said that, now I can see that you ignore how phosphor colors behave, which in the end tells me that you might know Ps very well, but regarding camera profiling you're lacking quite some knowledge.
OT, I've ONLY commented so far on two attributes: A comparison that thus far appears to be unfair. A single image that I believe looks worse with the application of your profile. It's subjective of course.
Also, if you ever come to a Spanish forum on where I use to be, I will first welcome you (because that’s gentleman do when a new one comes and introduces himself) and then will start to discuss.
Then ask questions who's answers you wish to hear on a Spanish photo forum; I have no desire and will not be posting on any such site.
But I won’t try to find out any mistake or misspelling in your book just to hit hard with my finger on it.
I haven’t and don't believe anyone else is taking you to task about spelling are they? IF so, point that post out to me. Or stop playing the victim.
I don't know if you know Chris Murphy or if he is also here, but you can ask him how did I treated him when I managed to bring him to a big intl. photo show in Barcelona a few years ago. We both performed a conference about color management, together.
I know Chris quite well and for decades, but your comments are again off topic.
Would you like if I read your book and post here every single and small mistake I find out? And, trust me, I will find them. Even that it’s not in my mother language.
I haven’t and don't believe anyone else is taking you to task about spelling are they? IF so, point that post out to me. Or stop playing the victim.
Now, that said, let me answer the main question
:
Yes please: HOW were the '
before" images on your site produced with respect to the target used and the software used to build them? OR are they canned C1 camera profiles?
Now, let me tell you that I wasted enough time replying to this; I won’t be replying unless you keep a respectful position.
And I've wasted enough time too. But then, who came here asking for feedback? Wasn't me.
PS: Regarding your last post, If you ever asked me to add another examples to make the comparison more fair/complete/real/whatever, I’d kindly find some time to add them. Now you achieved the opposite from me.
I'm asking you to explain how ALL the '
before' images were produced with respect to a target and generation of the camera profile.
That's all I'm asking. IF as I believe but may be wrong, the '
Before' images were all canned C1 profiles, your examples ARE bogus. And I explained HOW you could fix that issue and show us JUST what your target provides using an apples to apples comparison. CAN or DID you do this? Yes or no?