The mind discounts the illuminant (colour constancy) while cameras do not. It seems to me that apparently, either the globe or the bulb inside it, if it was on or warming up, emitted or reflected a spectrum which the camera saw and the eye discounted.
The mind doesn't do selective adaptation. In addition, the "extra" perceived information by the camera seems to be in the green region, which is exactly where you'd expect human vision to have an advantage. Imo, there are two possibilities:
1. the camera's green response is triggered by spikes in the green region, spikes that my vision equalises.
2. the camera's ability to detect the full red response is limited by for example the IR filter
Polarisation in both the source, as well as the camera (lenscoatings?) may exacerbate the problem.
From previous experience, nr 2 is the core of a lot of camera issues. As an example: the inability of an autofocus system to work properly under old energy-savings lighting.