Jeremy, I don't live in GB. So I'm not familiar with the day-to-day issues regarding this case. I'm taking the article as telling the truth. But even if there are untruths in it does not change the fact that government control of our medical care can hurt our rights to make free choices about that care. Obama lied when he said Obamacare would not cause you to change your doctors. In the end, a single payer system must make choices since there is not an ever supply of funding to pay for everything. So government's choices may not comport with the individual's choice so they have lost their freedom to decide. If you have a disease, and the government says that because of your old age, the government will not fund care, you're screwed. Unless you're very rich and can pay out of pocket or you can afford to fly to America for the care. With private insurance, you have more options and more free choices.
Look how Brexit is affecting national health care, a government controlled system. Brits overseas, ex-pats, might lose health care once Brexit goes into effect. Had there been private health care, individuals would still be able to decide what kind and how much care their insurance policies handles. They lost their freedom to decide how to live by turning their lives over to the care of bureaucrats in government who care little about them. I would rather keep important decisions about my life in my hands. I just don't trust the government. That extends to making end-of-life decisions. When you go in for serious surgery in the US, the hospital asks you to sign or not sign a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). If you sign it, and you have major failure let's say of breathing or your heart during or after the procedure, the hospital will not take extraordinary measures to keep you alive. They will let nature takes it's course. If you don't sign it, they are obligated by law to take all measures to keep you alive even if you have to be put in a induced coma state. There's no telling what government may decide once they take over fully. That's what makes the British kid's story so important. It represents a transfer of power to the state about our personal freedoms to make choices.
Harry H. Soos, Alan, get with the reality!
We, the expats caught up abroad in the Brexit shitstorm, ALWAYS HAVE HAD access to private medical insurance, both abroad as in the UK! I ran it in tandem with my and my wife's entitlement to the local Spanish national health service (a RIGHT granted because it was reciprocated in Britain.) It would still be reciprocated
in out foreign country of residence only if we leave with an agreed deal, as would the rights of Europeans still living or working in Britain. It is the nightmare scenario of crashing out with no deal, as the Ultra Blue lot wants to do, that tears up everything for both sides.
I no longer have that private cover because it became too bloody expsnsive for me to afford, exactly as in your own case.
What in hell is there not to understand? It has been reduced to the most simple of terms anyone can formulate - if you don't get it now you never, ever will.