Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: fox  (Read 863 times)

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7830
fox
« on: February 08, 2019, 02:45:41 pm »

?

Jeremy
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14344
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: fox
« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2019, 03:00:00 pm »

Who took the second shot, Ivo? ;)

Ivophoto

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1104
Re: fox
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2019, 03:05:42 pm »

Who took the second shot, Ivo? ;)


Then it would be his backside.

Nice shots btw.
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17228
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: fox
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2019, 03:11:14 pm »

I vote for the first one (by Jeremy, not Ivo).
Good catch.
A typical London scene?   ;)
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

faberryman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 937
Re: fox
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2019, 03:20:47 pm »

Yes, it is a fox.

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14344
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: fox
« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2019, 03:29:50 pm »

With two images, I think we now have sufficient data for A.I. to reconstruct a full-body fox? Ivo can contribute the missing backside ;)

James Clark

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1134
Re: fox
« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2019, 04:38:28 pm »

Jeremy,  I actually love the second one.  Sure its unconventional, but it shows the animal's face, and the engagement of his look in interesting.  I might lighten the background (or take it more to grey than the bluish tinge I see, and I might actually crop him a little more to the right (so that there no part of the front of his back leg showing fro a cleaner sweep if the body off the page).

Logged

John R

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3461
Re: fox
« Reply #7 on: February 08, 2019, 09:18:58 pm »

Jeremy,  I actually love the second one.  Sure its unconventional, but it shows the animal's face, and the engagement of his look in interesting.  I might lighten the background (or take it more to grey than the bluish tinge I see, and I might actually crop him a little more to the right (so that there no part of the front of his back leg showing fro a cleaner sweep if the body off the page).
The second shot reminds me of the many good model images I see where the photographer tries to highlight a portion of the face in a different way. There is something to what James says, a face peering as intensely at us as we gaze at it. Surely with the pure white unaffecting background that is what comes across.

JR
« Last Edit: February 09, 2019, 03:09:52 am by John R »
Logged

Ivophoto

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1104
Re: fox
« Reply #8 on: February 09, 2019, 01:53:11 am »

?

Jeremy

For me, the second is far better.

The first shot is a fox in the center of the frame. The second shot takes advantage of the frame, it leads outside the frame. The fox is more in his habitat without seeing it, but it is there, because you use the frame.
Logged

Chairman Bill

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3092
    • flickr page
Re: fox
« Reply #9 on: February 09, 2019, 03:57:22 am »

Both look pretty good to me

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5745
Re: fox
« Reply #10 on: February 09, 2019, 07:23:32 am »

Bob_B

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2019
  • Deniably plausible
    • Nature's Beauty Revealed
Re: fox
« Reply #11 on: February 09, 2019, 07:52:50 am »

Yes to both, but I agree that the second is special.
Logged
Nature's Beauty Revealed
www.belasphoto.com

32BT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3064
    • Pictures
Re: fox
« Reply #12 on: February 09, 2019, 10:25:46 am »

These scream copious amounts of bold negative space to me...
Logged
Regards,
~ O ~
If you can stomach it: pictures

John R

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3461
Re: fox
« Reply #13 on: February 09, 2019, 10:29:08 am »

These scream copious amounts of bold negative space to me...
I agree. It gives the subject and its environment a wonderful tension.

JR
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14344
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: fox
« Reply #14 on: February 09, 2019, 10:31:22 am »

Re the OP: it is a good start, as Americans would say. Us, Eastern Europeans, however... ;)

bobfriedman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 155
Re: fox
« Reply #15 on: February 09, 2019, 11:11:07 am »

#1 is quite nice.. congrats!
Logged
Bob Friedman
pbase.com/bobfriedman

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7830
Re: fox
« Reply #16 on: February 09, 2019, 02:47:47 pm »

Jeremy,  I actually love the second one.  Sure its unconventional, but it shows the animal's face, and the engagement of his look in interesting.  I might lighten the background (or take it more to grey than the bluish tinge I see, and I might actually crop him a little more to the right (so that there no part of the front of his back leg showing fro a cleaner sweep if the body off the page).

James, the bluish tinge seems to have been introduced in the JPEG rendering for posting here; it's not present in the original. Your suggested crop is a good idea.


These scream copious amounts of bold negative space to me...

Interesting, Oscar. I don't much like what it does to #1 (of mine), as I like the square crop; but your composition does enhance the effect I was seeking in #2. I'm not sure how you ended up with the pink snow, I must confess.

Jeremy
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17228
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: fox
« Reply #17 on: February 09, 2019, 02:54:09 pm »

Of all four versions, the original first is still by far the best, for me.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

32BT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3064
    • Pictures
Re: fox
« Reply #18 on: February 09, 2019, 03:24:38 pm »

I'm not sure how you ended up with the pink snow, I must confess.

Oh, probably Snapseed "smart" context aware fill taking a bit of fox along. It was just a quick & filthy edit on the tablet for illustrative purposes. Certainly didn't mean to suggest adding any color.
Logged
Regards,
~ O ~
If you can stomach it: pictures

Telecaster

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3690
Re: fox
« Reply #19 on: February 09, 2019, 04:54:09 pm »

#1 does it for me.

-Dave-
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up