Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Hoodoo habitat  (Read 438 times)

sdwilsonsct

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3296
Hoodoo habitat
« on: October 21, 2018, 01:01:16 pm »

Either? Neither? Thanks!

Two23

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 827
Re: Hoodoo habitat
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2018, 01:03:01 pm »

I like the first one.  The light isn't working for me on the second.


Kent in SD
Logged
Qui sedes ad dexteram Patris,
miserere nobis.

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: Hoodoo habitat
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2018, 01:26:27 pm »

I like the first one.  The light isn't working for me on the second.

Agreed.

Jeremy
Logged

churly

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1294
Re: Hoodoo habitat
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2018, 03:43:52 pm »

I actually prefer the second.  Something to do with the balance.  I also think that you seem to be moving toward more subtle light and a more gentle rendering?  There is a lot of room to explore there.
Chuck
Logged
Chuck Hurich

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Hoodoo habitat
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2018, 07:57:40 pm »

I think both are worth while.

The first features the hoodoos as "spectators" of the scene very nicely, while the second seems to be more about the mountain.

I would be tempted to liven up the processing a little in the second.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Rajan Parrikar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3950
    • Rajan Parrikar
Re: Hoodoo habitat
« Reply #5 on: October 22, 2018, 05:22:56 pm »

The second composition has much potential.

sdwilsonsct

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3296
Re: Hoodoo habitat
« Reply #6 on: October 22, 2018, 05:44:23 pm »

I would be tempted to liven up the processing a little in the second.

OK, I'll go back to this. I thought #2 might have too many elements. Might work as a large print with much to look at.

Thanks to all.
Pages: [1]   Go Up