A friend of mine was musing on camera sizes and why even his Fuji is bigger than his OM1 used to be. After a big of Googling, I found this illustration that the OM was pretty small.
His response was "Wow, the Nikon was an ugly thing". I can't say I disagree with him. I realise it wasn't primarily designed for aesthetics, but why was the superstructure on the Nikon so large and asymmetric?
Just curious.
Jeremy