Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Only Street  (Read 4615 times)

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: Only Street
« Reply #20 on: May 14, 2018, 06:13:58 am »

This thread has re kindled my interest in street photography which I had abandoned for a while. Could be a very interesting forum if it remains civil? :)

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Only Street
« Reply #21 on: May 14, 2018, 08:12:03 am »

This thread has re kindled my interest in street photography which I had abandoned for a while. Could be a very interesting forum if it remains civil? :)
If you ignore the endless discussions about definitions and terminology, I think "Street" (or whatever) is going to provide a goldmine here.

It's good to have you back, Stamper.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

KLaban

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2451
    • Keith Laban Photography
Re: Only Street
« Reply #22 on: May 14, 2018, 08:16:45 am »

If you ignore the endless discussions about definitions and terminology, I think "Street" (or whatever) is going to provide a goldmine here.

It's good to have you back, Stamper.

Certainly looks that way!

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Only Street
« Reply #23 on: May 14, 2018, 01:43:32 pm »

If you ignore the endless discussions about definitions and terminology, I think "Street" (or whatever) is going to provide a goldmine here.

It's good to have you back, Stamper.

"Street or Whatever" seems a pretty good, all-encompassing new name that will please all and delight none!

:-)

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: Only Street
« Reply #24 on: May 15, 2018, 03:33:07 am »

This thread has re kindled my interest in street photography which I had abandoned for a while. Could be a very interesting forum if it remains civil? :)

I'm pleased to see you back. I shall do my best to keep the civility levels high.

Jeremy
Logged

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: Only Street
« Reply #25 on: May 15, 2018, 03:54:48 am »

Thanks

KLaban

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2451
    • Keith Laban Photography
Re: Only Street
« Reply #26 on: May 15, 2018, 12:43:31 pm »

Hell, this place is buzzing. If it carries on this place will need to be renamed The Luminous Street.

;-)

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: Only Street
« Reply #27 on: May 15, 2018, 12:49:22 pm »

Hell, this place is buzzing. If it carries on this place will need to be renamed The Luminous Street.

;-)
:) :) :)

32BT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3095
    • Pictures
Re: Only Street
« Reply #28 on: May 15, 2018, 01:06:03 pm »

"Street or Whatever" seems a pretty good, all-encompassing new name that will please all and delight none!

:-)

+1

Or call it the Human Interest section. Some are just more interested/interesting than others...
Logged
Regards,
~ O ~
If you can stomach it: pictures

KLaban

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2451
    • Keith Laban Photography
Re: Only Street
« Reply #29 on: May 15, 2018, 01:16:22 pm »

"Street or Whatever" seems a pretty good, all-encompassing new name that will please all and delight none!

:-)

Yup, I like the casual inference.

Telecaster

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3686
Re: Only Street
« Reply #30 on: May 15, 2018, 03:32:56 pm »

"Street or Whatever" works for me too. I love urban photography, with and without people, out- and in-doors.

-Dave-
Logged

KLaban

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2451
    • Keith Laban Photography
Re: Only Street
« Reply #31 on: May 15, 2018, 04:25:29 pm »

"Street or Whatever" works for me too. I love urban photography, with and without people, out- and in-doors.

-Dave-

I'm tempted to rename the Without Prejudice: Street thread to Without Prejudice: Street or Whatever.

?

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Only Street
« Reply #32 on: May 15, 2018, 04:34:10 pm »

I'm tempted to rename the Without Prejudice: Street thread to Without Prejudice: Street or Whatever.

?

Y knot?

Rob

KLaban

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2451
    • Keith Laban Photography
Re: Only Street
« Reply #33 on: May 15, 2018, 04:54:00 pm »

fredjeang2

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1376
Re: Only Street
« Reply #34 on: May 15, 2018, 05:36:05 pm »

Yup, I like the casual inference.
I'm trying to figure out how british language managed to group together the concept of casual with inference, as in french it's not working.
If I understand a possible meaning it would besomething like: informal deduction?
Is it correct or does it have another meaning?
Logged

KLaban

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2451
    • Keith Laban Photography
Re: Only Street
« Reply #35 on: May 16, 2018, 04:58:59 am »

I'm trying to figure out how british language managed to group together the concept of casual with inference, as in french it's not working.
If I understand a possible meaning it would besomething like: informal deduction?
Is it correct or does it have another meaning?

...my casual understanding that was based on suggestion rather than a statement.

;-)

fredjeang2

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1376
Re: Only Street
« Reply #36 on: May 16, 2018, 05:49:35 am »

...my casual understanding that was based on suggestion rather than a statement.

;-)
Thanks Keith.
Cheers.
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Only Street
« Reply #37 on: May 16, 2018, 07:17:10 am »

I'm trying to figure out how british language managed to group together the concept of casual with inference, as in french it's not working.
If I understand a possible meaning it would besomething like: informal deduction?
Is it correct or does it have another meaning?

It's a version of the double negative that English speakers find confusing at first, but have probably grown used to because of the programmes on tv. Probably.

"Ain't never not doin' that no mo'"  ?
« Last Edit: May 16, 2018, 08:04:27 am by Rob C »
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up