A bit of backstory - need both advice and validation on my own thoughts, but please bear with me, even if some questions sound quite amateur.
After a longer break I'm getting back to studio photography, and I'm thinking about going a digital medium format.
I'm leaning towards Hasselblad, as the studio I was renting used to have a Hasselblad H4D40, and I absolutely loved it - the feel, IQ compared to 35mm I had at the time, ease of post processing. The only annoying thing was high crop factor, we did not have much space, so some shots were a tight call.
Some of this nostalgia might be attributed to fact that I used to shoot a lot with film on V system (501c), and this was how I got into portraiture.
I still use it natural light/outdoor and personal projects - however due to long and unpredictable development times in local lab this is not an option for shoots when hard commitment on delivery date is required. Also, I prefer minimal retouch on film shots, which contradicts with studio setting (at least for me).
Most of my shoots are TFP projects, so budget is limited - but a view it as an expensive hobby rather something i do for profit.
For digital outdoor and casual photography I used a beat up Canon 6d with mixed set of primes. I was planning for a while to upgrade it to newer model - a 5d mk4 probably, but then got an offer to join on co-renting a studio. Thats then I started thinking and researching alternative option - instead of upgrading 35mm, sell some of less used lenses and maybe go for used Hasselblad? The only problem is i never had a chance to use these available models, and not sure how they compare IQ wise to new 35mm (maybe its not worth a hassle anymore?).
Also, I heard a lot of good words about pentax 645d, which also seems to be within budget. The only problem is that i never had a chance to try it - where i live to only option is to buy online.
Sorry for long, messy and complicated first post.
Any comments, tips, warnings and pointers will be highly appreciated