Topic: Without Prejudice 3 (Read 390833 times)

I'm afraid the answer will disappoint you. In this particular one I played a little with few Nik filters, what you see is not how it looked like initially; I think the sunlit filter is most responsible for how it looks. It was shot with a RX10 mark IV at 88mm equiv.
The San Juan one it's mostly good light with a RX-100 (the original one) at max zoom, 100mm equiv.

Now there could be something that you see as both of them are Sony, with a 1" sensor, both compacts at a similar focal length and most important sharpness is average.

petermfiore · « **Reply #2107 on:** September 27, 2018, 05:24:49 pm »

Another Hazy Day...

Peter

Rob C · « **Reply #2108 on:** September 27, 2018, 05:33:05 pm »

Quote from: petermfiore on September 27, 2018, 05:24:49 pm

Another Hazy Day...

Peter

Now an object lesson on the value of WP!

Were critiquers allowed in the room, they'd have accused you of massive camera shake and suggested all sorts of stabilisation systems to make it better.

:-)

RSL · « **Reply #2109 on:** September 27, 2018, 06:01:38 pm »

Lions and tigers a bears, oh my. Lions and tigers a bears, oh my. You simply can't post a picture with camera shake.

Oops. Forgot this is "Without prejudice."

petermfiore · « **Reply #2110 on:** September 27, 2018, 06:05:18 pm »

Rob and Russ,

My knees are shaking with the thought of offending anyone over such silliness...lol

Peter

Eric Myrvaagnes · « **Reply #2111 on:** September 28, 2018, 12:31:14 am »

No problem.
JohnR wiggles his camera all the time.

32BT · « **Reply #2112 on:** September 28, 2018, 05:09:15 am »

Quote from: Rob C on September 27, 2018, 05:33:05 pm

Now an object lesson on the value of WP!

Were critiquers allowed in the room, they'd have accused you of massive camera shake and suggested all sorts of stabilisation systems to make it better.

:-)

Maybe this is the reason that windowreflections no longer are what they were touted to be.

Double pane glass everywhere...

JNB_Rare · « **Reply #2113 on:** September 28, 2018, 09:20:11 am »

Voted Most Likely.

Rob C · « **Reply #2114 on:** September 28, 2018, 09:40:30 am »

Quote from: opgr on September 28, 2018, 05:09:15 am

Maybe this is the reason that windowreflections no longer are what they were touted to be.

Double pane glass everywhere...

Alas and alack, 'tis the curse of modernism with everything getting so much better, with no visible signs of improvement.

;-)

32BT · « **Reply #2115 on:** September 29, 2018, 01:34:10 pm »

A picture a day keeps the... I have ab-so-lutely no idea why i like this. Maybe just "pretty colors". I do know i'd like to do this one time with a large multistorey apartement building and create an extremely large, extremely detailed image via a pano shot perhaps.

Slobodan Blagojevic · « **Reply #2116 on:** September 29, 2018, 01:52:48 pm »

Quote from: opgr on September 29, 2018, 01:34:10 pm

... I do know i'd like to do this one time with a large multistorey apartement building and create an extremely large, extremely detailed image via a pano shot perhaps.

Seems that Clarissa Bonet from Chicago beat you to it:

http://www.edelmangallery.com/artists/artists/a-f/clarissa-bonet.html

32BT · « **Reply #2117 on:** September 29, 2018, 02:24:12 pm »

Quote from: Slobodan Blagojevic on September 29, 2018, 01:52:48 pm

Seems that Clarissa Bonet from Chicago beat you to it:

http://www.edelmangallery.com/artists/artists/a-f/clarissa-bonet.html

I was thinking more along the lines of Michael Wolf, but it is in similar vein as yours. Of course, where i live, we don't do skyscrapers. I would probably do a composite of multiple shots so all interiors are visible. Not to pry, but merely to get an impression of atmosphere.

Rob C · « **Reply #2118 on:** September 29, 2018, 02:37:58 pm »

Quote from: opgr on September 29, 2018, 01:34:10 pm

A picture a day keeps the... I have ab-so-lutely no idea why i like this. Maybe just "pretty colors". I do know i'd like to do this one time with a large multistorey apartement building and create an extremely large, extremely detailed image via a pano shot perhaps.

I like that Oscar; just a touch of the voyeuristic...

I think you'd have to be up on the roof of Jay Meisel's old bank building (since sold), or follow in the footsteps of one Michael Wolf to get the nice, multi-interest, bird's eye view shot of people-who-don't-use-curtains (maybe some are also ladies who lunch?) which, at a stroke, turns them into exhibitionists, thus a marriage made, if not in heaven, at least up in the skies. Win win.

;-)

armand · « **Reply #2119 on:** September 30, 2018, 02:31:51 pm »

storm

Author Topic: Without Prejudice 3 (Read 390833 times)