They know it's a pathetic Muslim ban (excluding Saudi Arabia as real funders of radical Islamism, for short-term monetary gain) and a great recruiting tool for terrorists. Besides, the 90-day higher level of scrutiny for imminent danger should have passed by now, unless the Trump administration has been sitting on its hands, or the ban is plain Muslim/religion-based discrimination. Who's next, Jews, or people with red hair, or photographers, or ...?
Cheers,
Bart
Stop with the liberal "it's a recruiting tool" for the terrorists. So maybe we shouldn't have bombed German cities during WWII because it was a recruiting tool for the Nazis? Because of Trump and Mattis, our bombing and toughness against Raqqa is about to force out ISIS from their last city stronghold. No one seems to be giving credit to Trump who said during the election campaign that he intended to destroy ISIS. Obama did little but talk a lot about toughness. Trump gets the job done.
Regarding the 90 days, the lower court held up the government from working out the details of the ban. It wasn't until June 12 that the Appeals court allowed the government to continue. Now that the SCOTUS has ruled, Trump has already announce the new procedures for visas for these 6 countries. Only those with close ties to America will be let in. So the new procedures are set.
Regarding the Muslim faith, it is true that most of the people in the 6 countries are Muslim. But that's the point. So are the terrorists. But there are many more Muslims in other countries who were not banned. They were blocked from the 6 nations only because those are failed states or a terrorist state in the case of Iran. But SCOTUS didn't even address the religious argument that was addressed by the lower court. SCOTUS assessed that the lower courts had no right to stop the president from banning certain countries and non Americans from entering this country as is his right by congressional legislation. Religion played no part in the SCOTUS decision. It wasn't even mentioned.