That's just another way of saying you think others have not brought new information to Oscar's topic by calling the photogs here as willfully blind. So why even post any replies if you have this opinion of the contributors? But yet you went on over and over and then needing to clarify again this useless obvious point that doesn't even address the topic...
1. Every time we posted our opinions we thought were interesting and added new info on the topic, you reminded us again that you shoot like you did when you worked as if you thought we were correcting or arguing with you.
If you want an interesting topic then you need to step up as well and not post with a dismissive tone to the rest of the contributors and 2. bad mouthing other famous photographers as if you knew them in relation to how they shoot within the context of Oscar's topic. No one asked your opinion on these photographers with such comments as I don't care for XXX photographer. 3. What the hell does that have to do with the topic?
1. "Every time we posted our opinions we thought were interesting and added new info on the topic, you reminded us again that you shoot like you did when you worked as if you thought we were correcting or arguing with you."
How odd; I was simply explaining why I believe as I believe. The only validation of point of view is that found in what we actually do; I'm sure you could write any number of theoretical variations on that, as could I, but the reality is inescapably in what we do.
2. ?
3. I'm left wondering what, exactly, the topic has become.
"And as usual there are over 1000 views of this thread and yet only 2 to 3 views of the posted image examples which tells me most of the folks reading this thread aren't logged in to LuLa."
Is this a complaint that few have waxed eloquent over your landscapes? FWIW. the most interesting photograph, for me, has been the Boubat one, and I did respond to it.
Rob C