Pages: [1]   Go Down

### AuthorTopic: 200% View?  (Read 2518 times)

#### IanSeward

• Full Member
• Offline
• Posts: 175
##### 200% View?
« on: April 22, 2017, 08:21:37 am »

OK, can someone explain what I am seeing when I view an image at >100%?

I assume as there is no real pixel information we are just seeing "interpolation" or non real effects?  Will different viewers produce different effects?

Is this so and if so why would you want to view an image at greater than 100%?

Thanks in advance for any help in understanding this.

Ian
Logged

#### Bob Rockefeller

• Sr. Member
• Offline
• Posts: 544
• macOS, iOS, Olympus OM-D E-M2, Epson P800
##### Re: 200% View?
« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2017, 09:59:56 am »

OK, can someone explain what I am seeing when I view an image at >100%?

I assume as there is no real pixel information we are just seeing "interpolation" or non real effects?

Is it not that each pixel is double size on screen? Not that there are "new" pixels added?
Logged
Bob Rockefeller
Midway, GA   www.bobrockefeller.com

#### pfigen

• Sr. Member
• Offline
• Posts: 534
##### Re: 200% View?
« Reply #2 on: April 23, 2017, 02:07:52 am »

"OK, can someone explain what I am seeing when I view an image at >100%?"

Well, at 100 percent, you see one screen pixel for on image pixel. At 50 percent you are seeing two image pixel for every screen pixel. At 200 percent you see half an image pixel per screen pixel, which you can imagine as the screen pixels stay the same size but the image pixels get larger and more spread apart.

Most programs should display the even amounts, 12.5%, 25%, 50%, 100%, 200% etc pretty much the same but once you choose intermediate magnifications, there are big differences in how different programs do the math to display those odd amounts. The later versions of Photoshop seem to have the best intermediate methods of displaying images.

"Is this so and if so why would you want to view an image at greater than 100%?"

Anytime you're working of highly detailed high resolution images, working at greater than 100 percent view and be beneficial. You might miss critical detail retouching at 100 percent or less. You might need to zoom all the way in to 1600 percent to fine tune a mask or a Path (in Ps). You might need to match the noise or grain level of an image after it gets smeared while retouching, and that is best done at greater than 100 percent ratios. Typically, when in Ps, you're going to be viewing at even numbered zoom levels, so the program will not be doing too much complicated display math.

I'm not sure how this relates to Capture One, but I often zoom in to greater than 1:1 where you can actually see very minute difference in detail and sharpening, especially when fine tuning the noise reduction and detail sliders in the NR panel. But most the time, in C1, I'm using the default fit to screen mode or the default double-click in the image to immediately go to 100 percent. Most of the time.

Logged

#### Jeff

• Jr. Member
• Offline
• Posts: 82
##### Re: 200% View?
« Reply #3 on: April 23, 2017, 02:50:12 am »

I have found zooming in to, say, 200﹪ is useful for checking / spotting out sensor dust.

Logged

#### IanSeward

• Full Member
• Offline
• Posts: 175
##### Re: 200% View?
« Reply #4 on: April 24, 2017, 05:02:07 am »

Thanks to all for taking the time to clarifying what is happening above 100%.  I am just seeing the same dots further apart, makes sense now:-)

Ian
Logged

#### Doug Peterson

• Sr. Member
• Offline
• Posts: 4205
##### Re: 200% View?
« Reply #5 on: April 24, 2017, 03:50:44 pm »

Just a quick note that >100% is especially helpful with things like spotting or focus checking on retina displays. The whole idea with "retina" resolution is that the pixels are so small and close together that the average person can't see the pixels at an average working distance. That's great as far as making images on-screen look beautiful but can be unhelpful when trying to do work where you need to see individual pixels.

#### Hoggy

• Full Member
• Offline
• Posts: 207
• Never take life, or anything in it, too seriously.
##### Re: 200% View?
« Reply #6 on: April 25, 2017, 09:44:59 pm »

(In LR)
Like others, I'll often do spot removals at either 2:1 or 3:1.
Another thing I find it useful for is making sure that ca/fringe removal is neither taking too much, nor too little..  Which, in LR, is mainly more of a problem when doing 'manual' fringe removal - either fully manual or using the fringe 'dropper' selector.  Its automatic 'remove CA' button is usually fine, but when going beyond that, 2:1/3:1 makes it easier to spot over-correction - you'll end up seeing cleared-color 'halo' looking structures around edges.
Logged
Cams: Pentax K-3, K-30 & Canon G7X, S100
Firm supporter of DNG, throwing away originals.
It's the hash, man..  That good hash!
Pages: [1]   Go Up