Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Zeiss Otus 85mm or 55mm  (Read 9124 times)

FelixBelloin

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 34
    • My gallery
Zeiss Otus 85mm or 55mm
« on: December 11, 2016, 11:21:26 am »

Hi everyone, I just sold my beloved Canon EF 70-200mm L f/2.8 USM to get the funds for superior optics. I shoot on a 5DSR, and lens performance makes quite a difference. I would qualify myself as a landscape photographer, with a certain enthousiasme for wildlife.
On the wide angle end of lenses, I have a trusty 16-35mm which works wonders, so I am looking into the normal/telephoto side of things.
I was wondering if anyone had any experience with any of these lenses: Zeiss Otus 55mm f/1.4, Zeiss Otus 85mm f/1.4mm.
I know 85mm is usually used in portrait photography, but I regularly used the 70-200 for landscape shots, as it's quite good at isolating subjects.
I am just slightly concerned to spend that much money on a lens that I would find too limiting, so if anyone use a 85mm of some description for landscapes I would be keen to hear his impressions.
Last but not least; I know camera bodies depreciate dramatically quickly, I was wondering if the same is true with high quality glass?

In brief:
For a landscape photographer would you recommend 55 or 85
Would the lens keep its value over time, better than a camera body would[/b]

Thank you so much for your time, sincerely, an undecided photographer.

scyth

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 584
Re: Zeiss Otus 85mm or 55mm
« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2016, 11:39:21 am »

I'd simply buy 2 new Sigmas (50 & 85mm) w/o even selling 70-200 instead of one Otus
Logged

FelixBelloin

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 34
    • My gallery
Re: Zeiss Otus 85mm or 55mm
« Reply #2 on: December 11, 2016, 11:46:35 am »

I'd simply buy 2 new Sigmas (50 & 85mm) w/o even selling 70-200 instead of one Otus

I understand your point, but that is not the purpose of my question. I have tried third party brands as well as Canon glass and nothing comes close to the Otus line. Thank you for your input but I am trying to get user feedback and 85mm and 55mm for landscapes, as well as time value conservation.

BernardLanguillier

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13039
    • http://www.flickr.com/photos/bernardlanguillier/sets/
Re: Zeiss Otus 85mm or 55mm
« Reply #3 on: December 11, 2016, 07:18:47 pm »

I own the 3 Otii that I have been using on a D810 mostly for stitching purposes.

I love both the 55mm that is my main stitching/DoF stacking lens, but the 85mm f1.4n is perhaps even a tiny bit more impressive performance wise. Both lenses over perform the sensor of the D810 and convey the feeling that even 100mp in 35mm wouldn't be a challenge. The focusing is incredibly smooth and accurate.

You cannot go wrong with any of these 2, they are probably the best lenses available short of the few very best Rodenstock tech camera lenses, and IMHO ahead of any MF lens I have seen.

Cheers,
Bernard

shadowblade

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2637
Re: Zeiss Otus 85mm or 55mm
« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2016, 04:47:39 am »

You're likely to find yourself very limited by focal lengths.

Of the two, I'd go for the 55mm - it's fairly useful in itself as a landscape focal length, but where it shines is in stitching wider panoramas. For longer focal lengths, you really need a zoom. Otherwise, you're either stuck cropping a lot or will find yourself having to go over cliffs, up into the air or other inaccessible places to get proper framing with a prime.

By the way, have you actually found a difference between Otus and other Canon or Sigma lenses at typical  landscape apertures? I'd expect the Otus to do better at f/1.4 (although the Sigma is very, very close) but doubt there is a visible, let alone measurable difference at f/6.3.
Logged

FelixBelloin

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 34
    • My gallery
Re: Zeiss Otus 85mm or 55mm
« Reply #5 on: December 12, 2016, 04:53:04 am »

I own the 3 Otii that I have been using on a D810 mostly for stitching purposes.

I love both the 55mm that is my main stitching/DoF stacking lens, but the 85mm f1.4n is perhaps even a tiny bit more impressive performance wise. Both lenses over perform the sensor of the D810 and convey the feeling that even 100mp in 35mm wouldn't be a challenge. The focusing is incredibly smooth and accurate.

You cannot go wrong with any of these 2, they are probably the best lenses available short of the few very best Rodenstock tech camera lenses, and IMHO ahead of any MF lens I have seen.

Cheers,
Bernard


Bernard,
Thank you very much for the helpful feedback. Your statement corroborates with what I have read on various reviews, it seems that the 85 is a touch sharper, but I doubt I would be find a significant difference. I think here it's more a question of which focal length is most suitable. Would you say you use the 85 much outside of portrait photography? The obvious choice would be to start with the 55, but now that I am left without telephoto, I might experience withdrawal syndrome!

FelixBelloin

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 34
    • My gallery
Re: Zeiss Otus 85mm or 55mm
« Reply #6 on: December 12, 2016, 05:00:04 am »

You're likely to find yourself very limited by focal lengths.

Of the two, I'd go for the 55mm - it's fairly useful in itself as a landscape focal length, but where it shines is in stitching wider panoramas. For longer focal lengths, you really need a zoom. Otherwise, you're either stuck cropping a lot or will find yourself having to go over cliffs, up into the air or other inaccessible places to get proper framing with a prime.

By the way, have you actually found a difference between Otus and other Canon or Sigma lenses at typical  landscape apertures? I'd expect the Otus to do better at f/1.4 (although the Sigma is very, very close) but doubt there is a visible, let alone measurable difference at f/6.3.

Hi shadowblade,
I think you are right, 55 would be more of an allrounder, and I am pretty sure I could find some non IS f4 70-200 up for grabs.
Apart from better contrast on the Otus, there is not a 1,999 marginal difference in image quality when stopped down indeed. I just quite like the look of wide open landscape shots when it comes to isolating subjects. For now I have been using an old Leica Summilux R 50mm f/1.4 which is a lovely vintage lens, but the results on the 5DSr are not acceptable (horrendous CA, seagull coma, out of this earth distortion).
That is why I am only interested in the 55 and the 85, I rarely shoot handheld and most of my wide angle work is done between f/6 and f/16, where wide open performance does not really matter.
The fact that the 55 has a 77mm filter thread is a small plus as well, as I won't have to double my filter collection.
I will go with the 55, thank you all for your feedback!

BernardLanguillier

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13039
    • http://www.flickr.com/photos/bernardlanguillier/sets/
Re: Zeiss Otus 85mm or 55mm
« Reply #7 on: December 12, 2016, 06:57:33 am »

By the way, have you actually found a difference between Otus and other Canon or Sigma lenses at typical  landscape apertures? I'd expect the Otus to do better at f/1.4 (although the Sigma is very, very close) but doubt there is a visible, let alone measurable difference at f/6.3.

Per my experience comparing the Otus to some of the best non Otus lenses, you do see a difference.

The only lens I have seen coming close at f5.6 is the new Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 E FL.

Cheers,
Bernard

shadowblade

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2637
Re: Zeiss Otus 85mm or 55mm
« Reply #8 on: December 12, 2016, 12:17:53 pm »

Per my experience comparing the Otus to some of the best non Otus lenses, you do see a difference.

The only lens I have seen coming close at f5.6 is the new Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 E FL.

Cheers,
Bernard

I can barely distinguish the 55 Otus and Sigma 50 on a 42MP sensor, even at f/1.4. Although Zeiss probably has less copy-to-copy variation.

Regardless, I'd take the zoom any day. When you need 116mm for an ideal composition, the zoom gives you that, at a quality level that is almost as good as the Otus (and equal to any other lens out there), while, with the prime, you're stuck at 85mm and cropping, giving up any IQ advantage you may have had. And, when you need 83mm, the zoom will give you that too, while the prime leaves you stuck cursing and wishing there wasn't a cliff/building/crocodile-infested river in the way to stop you from taking a few steps back.
Logged

FelixBelloin

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 34
    • My gallery
Re: Zeiss Otus 85mm or 55mm
« Reply #9 on: December 12, 2016, 01:10:05 pm »

I can barely distinguish the 55 Otus and Sigma 50 on a 42MP sensor, even at f/1.4. Although Zeiss probably has less copy-to-copy variation.

Regardless, I'd take the zoom any day. When you need 116mm for an ideal composition, the zoom gives you that, at a quality level that is almost as good as the Otus (and equal to any other lens out there), while, with the prime, you're stuck at 85mm and cropping, giving up any IQ advantage you may have had. And, when you need 83mm, the zoom will give you that too, while the prime leaves you stuck cursing and wishing there wasn't a cliff/building/crocodile-infested river in the way to stop you from taking a few steps back.

I know what you mean but I quite light limitations in a sense. I have been using zooms almost exclusively apart from the odd 50 prime mentioned above, and I found that, even though zooms are more accommodating, having to work around the fixed focal length makes you think a bit more about your shot.
When and if the 70-200 mk iii comes out, I know I will be tempted, but for know I want to try something a bit more challenging!

shadowblade

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2637
Re: Zeiss Otus 85mm or 55mm
« Reply #10 on: December 12, 2016, 01:33:16 pm »

There's no 'thinking about the shot' in terms of focal length when you've gone halfway around the world to shoot landscapes. When you do that, you'd better make sure you have the gear you need, just as you'd better make sure you have your tides, lunar and solar charts all calculated and expected climate accounted for. And it helps to plan all the key shots before you even book flights and accomodation. Otherwise, you're just not going to get the shot and you've wasted the trip.

In many places, you can't just stand somewhere else to re-frame the shot because you don't have the right focal length - usually, local geography or the lack of a jetpack get in the way. And no amount of 'thinking' can get around that - you either have the gear or you don't get the shot.
Logged

scyth

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 584
Re: Zeiss Otus 85mm or 55mm
« Reply #11 on: December 12, 2016, 02:30:26 pm »

Per my experience comparing the Otus to some of the best non Otus lenses, you do see a difference.

there is a difference between "see" and "measure", in the field you are not in the lab... but whatever makes you happy of course.
Logged

BernardLanguillier

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13039
    • http://www.flickr.com/photos/bernardlanguillier/sets/
Re: Zeiss Otus 85mm or 55mm
« Reply #12 on: December 12, 2016, 05:49:08 pm »

there is a difference between "see" and "measure", in the field you are not in the lab... but whatever makes you happy of course.

Of course.

Cheers,
Bernard

RobertJ

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 701
Re: Zeiss Otus 85mm or 55mm
« Reply #13 on: December 12, 2016, 09:31:05 pm »

The 85 is probably a bit better, but less versatile.

Shooting landscapes, you're usually stopped down a few stops, so you kind of lose the main advantages of the Otus lenses: APO glass that gives you almost zero out of focus color fringing, and superb sharpness at very large apertures.

With that said, the Otus lenses, stopped down at f/4 or 5.6, will probably still have better corner to corner sharpness and higher microcontrast than anything from Sigma. 

The Sigma 85mm in particular has tremendous sharpness figures.  Some would say even higher than the Otus, but with the downside of purple and green out of focus fringing.  Shooting landscape, would you notice a difference?

If you go with 85mm, the Milvus might be worth renting...

Edit: If you're isolating things in your landscape photos, the Otus is probably worth it.
« Last Edit: December 12, 2016, 09:36:29 pm by RobertJ »
Logged

FelixBelloin

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 34
    • My gallery
Re: Zeiss Otus 85mm or 55mm
« Reply #14 on: December 13, 2016, 04:55:00 am »


The Sigma 85mm in particular has tremendous sharpness figures.  Some would say even higher than the Otus, but with the downside of purple and green out of focus fringing.  Shooting landscape, would you notice a difference?

If you go with 85mm, the Milvus might be worth renting...

Edit: If you're isolating things in your landscape photos, the Otus is probably worth it.

Hi Robert,

The sigma is truly impressive indeed, it's incredible to see this company offer incredible glass with their art series. If I was using it at a typical landscape aperture, I would definitely go for the sigma, however, I am planning on using the lens for isolating subjects, for this nice 3D effect that gives a nice sense of depth in wide open images. I also think that the Otus will outlive me, while I am not so sure about the Sigma (I am slightly biased here, as the sigmas I have owned in the past were quite poorly made).
I went out with a 50 and an 90mm yesterday to make up my mind, and I am more confortable with the longer end, so will probably change my mind and go for the 85.
The Milvus familliy has one strong argument going for it: weather sealing. I am planing on going to the Philippines and Iceland in the next two years, and I don't know how to Otus would cope, with salty air, humidity, extreme cold. Any feedback welcome!
Thank you,

Felix

FelixBelloin

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 34
    • My gallery
Re: Zeiss Otus 85mm or 55mm
« Reply #15 on: December 13, 2016, 05:00:35 am »

There's no 'thinking about the shot' in terms of focal length when you've gone halfway around the world to shoot landscapes.

You are perfectly right, and I can guaranty you I am an utter maniac when it comes to trip planning, I am no stranger to suncalc, stellarium and spending hours on end on google street view/flickr to mark my POIs. I count on my 16-35mm to provide me with the flexibility I need most of the time. Of course I will look rather foolish on the edge of a cliff should my 85 be too long, but that would probably be a rare occasion. And as I said, 70-200 f/4 non IS can be purchased really cheap these days, so might get one of those as backup.
If I end up incapable of taking a shot in any of my upcoming trips because of the lack of flexibility, I will put a caption saying you warned me!

shadowblade

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2637
Re: Zeiss Otus 85mm or 55mm
« Reply #16 on: December 16, 2016, 10:31:36 am »

The wide end tends to be where you can get away with primes a lot more. Scenes shot at those focal lengths tend to be more amenable to stitching, using a 35mm or 50mm lens, or a 24mm tilt-shift; with a 35mm or 50mm prime, it's easy enough to replicate the angle of view of almost any wider lens. That often isn't as practical at longer focal lengths, due to subject considerations.
Logged

scooby70

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 483
Re: Zeiss Otus 85mm or 55mm
« Reply #17 on: December 16, 2016, 12:00:08 pm »

I know what you mean but I quite light limitations in a sense. I have been using zooms almost exclusively apart from the odd 50 prime mentioned above, and I found that, even though zooms are more accommodating, having to work around the fixed focal length makes you think a bit more about your shot.
When and if the 70-200 mk iii comes out, I know I will be tempted, but for know I want to try something a bit more challenging!

Does working around a prime focal length and thinking about the shot include changing position to get the framing you want with a prime? If it does you're changing perspective but I'm sure you know that.
Logged

-chrille-

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 55
Re: Zeiss Otus 85mm or 55mm
« Reply #18 on: December 16, 2016, 12:23:34 pm »

What about Canon TS-E 90? How does this lens qualifies against the Otus 85 in terms of sharpness and lack of abberations?

I dont know what distance you usually shooting when isolating nature subjects. If you are close the TS-E at f/2.8 gives a better isolation and shallow depth of field due to shorter minimum focus distance than Otus 85 at f/1.4.
Logged

Eric Brody

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 343
    • http://www.ericbrodyphoto.com
Re: Zeiss Otus 85mm or 55mm
« Reply #19 on: December 16, 2016, 01:06:41 pm »

It appears your question is really 55 vs 85. You plan to get an Otus regardless, lucky you. I am reminded of a question I had when I was a view camera photographer. I asked a friend, more accomplished than I whether to get a 47 or 55 super wide for the 4x5. His reply was to go for the wider lens, his comment, "sometimes you just can't back up." Realizing you're looking at the best of the best, you can crop (horror of horrors :-)) the 55, you can't "widen" the 85.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up