Support for Fujifilm X-T2, but still preliminary support for X-Pro2 according to release notes? Very strange!
I think that's a bug in the release notes. I don't have an X-T2 to check, though. But with X-Pro2 files, the lens profile section of COne9.3 shows manufacturer's profile in effect for all my files. Note, however, that the only one where it seems to matter is the 35/2.0, which is very dependent on software correction for its significant barrel distortion. I sent Capture One an egregious example of the 35/2.0's distortion at some point, and was pleased to see its corrections implemented. The 16/1.4, 23/1.4 (and 35/1.4, which I don't have) don't need much correction, and none is offered in the lens profile dialog. Has anyone tried the new 23/2.0 in release 9.3 of Capture One? It appears to have been designed for the X-Pro2 and have a similar philosophy (small, quick, software-dependent) to the 35/2.0.
Not supporting the compressed RAF files is a small disappointment, and if that is what defines "preliminary support," then the X-T2 should say that as well. Adobe supports the compressed files because Fuji provided them with the software to do it (I hear through the rumor mill). The result is a bßit of a performance issue. I compress my files a directory at a time, after editing and processing.π