I suppose you think of the South China Sea issue as humorous as we down here in Australia think of Brexit but we are now faced with having Chinese missiles 25% closer to us than before. This is on top of some dingbat official in Darwin who just granted a Chinese government owned company a 99 year lease of the Port of Darwin.
I don't really think of the SCS as either humorous or not humorous.
I certainly don't think of Brexit as funny either, just as the result of a godforsaken notion to throw the question at a population not really informed enough to know what it means. Such a population is a plum for the plucking by any politician wanting to feed off a populist agenda. You can see this by looking at the government records: one lot comes in, bankrupts the place on grandiose public expenditure it can't afford. (No goverment can afford anything: it has no money; it uses ours.) So what happens? After the public discovers how bad things got, they vote in another colour of government and then, just when the reserves start to build up again, they switch sides and rerun the wasting-of video. You couldn't make it up.
But it absolutely describes the political blindness and short-termism of the public mind. In Britain it's simple: the left consumes whilst in power, and then the right tries to mop up the mess and refurbish the bank account. Which of course, is impossible if one continues to spend beyond one's earnings. So, less gets spent, people feel they are losing out on freebies, and then vote back in the bunch that broke the bank in the first place.
Snag is, all local and governmental elections are for finite terms and can be changed next election time; not so Brexit.
But on consideration, yep, I think building a new prison island makes perfectly sound sense. Who wants these people nearby? You'd be safe: your sharks are better.
Rob C