Thanks Bob and Roth. Yes, unfortunately I've tried printing many sheets of yellow only mostly between cleaning cycles and it gave me no change either. I only did a wipe and not a soak of the head with Windex which made no difference as well. Most of the time when I have had problems with this machine it would be a channel dropping all the way or nearly all the way out. I have had the nozzle checks with numerous breaks in the pattern to indicate a dirty or clogged head but they have very rare. Funny thing too is that my machine could set for varying lengths of time and I could come back and start printing something, sometimes starting with a nozzle pattern, and everything run perfectly. Then suddenly I would get banding or completely lose a color and print a nozzle check to find a channel nearly completely gone. I was always able to clear these with some form of basic cleaning, usually a pair. I, like some others, have come to believe these are not clogs at all, but an air or vacuum problem or a head malfunction rather than a clog.
I think the fact so many people have had problems with these machines and Epson has done so little is ridiculous. I'm not one of these people to jump up and down about compensation etc. but couldn't Epson at least put out some available information instead of price gouging on the back end of the sale of their printers? Can't you give us a little more than "Well you're not printing enough. These machines need to be run regularly." I don't deny this to be a truth but I'm doubtful of that being my issues considering the symptoms. Their answer is to send out a tech to throw expensive parts at the machine and hope it works. I heard an interview with an Epson tech online that stated "What people don't realize is that the head is considered a consumable and has a life span of what I would say is about 3 years." Well, OK. I'm fine with that. But why is that not common knowledge like it is for the other companies and why does Epson charge outrageous prices for an item that is considered a consumable? I guess they want us to just buy another printer instead of a new head. Ridiculous. I guess that's what I will end up doing. It will not be an Epson.
Thanks again for the advice so far. Can anyone advise if one of the lesser ink cartridge machines is sufficient for photographic purposes since I am not reproducing fine art? I'm trying to cram in some research on Canon and HP should I decide on another printer. I have a colormunki for paper profiling already.